论文检索

Yusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro Watanabe

Recently, we have often observed hallucinated citations or references that do not correspond to any existing work in papers under review, preprints, or published papers. Such hallucinated citations pose a serious concern to scientific reliability. When they appear in accepted papers, they may also negatively affect the credibility of conferences. In this study, we refer to hallucinated citations as “HalluCitation” and systematically investigate their prevalence and impact. We analyze all papers published at ACL, NAACL, and EMNLP in 2024 and 2025, including main conference, Findings, and workshop papers. Our analysis reveals that nearly 300 papers contain at least one HalluCitation, most of which were published in 2025. Notably, half of these papers were identified at EMNLP 2025, the most recent conference, indicating that this issue is rapidly increasing. Moreover, more than 100 such papers were accepted as main conference and Findings papers at EMNLP 2025, affecting the credibility.

Ahmad Jabbar, Cleo Condoravdi, Christopher Potts

Compositional generalization benchmarks seek to assess whether learning agents can successfully combine familiar concepts in novel ways. COGS (Kim & Linzen 2020, COGS, EMNLP) provides a suite of such tasks in the area of interpretive semantics (mapping sentences to logical forms). A noteworthy finding for COGS is that model performance varies widely across tasks. In this paper, we argue that these performance differences reflect deep properties of these tasks. We focus on two COGS tasks: an easy task (models are generally successful) and a hard task (no present-day models get any traction). Using both experiments and conceptual analysis, we argue that the easy task requires only a single distributional generalization that is well-supported by the training data, whereas the hard task involves a learning target that is ambiguous or even contradicted by the training data. We additionally argue that pretraining can disambiguate the hard task without compromising the goal of testing compositional generalization. Overall, our findings offer practical guidance to designers of compositional generalization benchmarks and also yield new insights into the nature of compositionality itself.

Valentin Barriere, Nahuel Gomez, Léo Hemamou, Sofia Callejas, Brian Ravenet

Aiming towards improving current computational models of humor detection, we propose a new multimodal dataset of stand-up comedies, in seven languages: English, French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Hungarian and Czech. Our dataset of more than 330 hours %, is at the time of writing the biggest available for this type of task, and the most diverse. The whole dataset is automatically annotated in laughter (from the audience), and the subpart left for model validation is manually annotated.% Contrary to contemporary approaches, we do not frame the task of humor detection as a binary sequence classification, but as word-level sequence labeling, in order to take into account all the context of the sequence and to capture the continuous joke tagging mechanism typically occurring in natural conversations. As par with unimodal baselines results, we propose a method for e propose a method to enhance the automatic laughter detection based on Audio Speech Recognition errors. Our code and data are available online: https://tinyurl.com/EMNLPHumourStandUpAnonym

Huu Tuong Tu, Huan Vu, Cuong Tien Nguyen, Dien Hy Ngo, Nguyen Thi Thu Trang

Traditional voice conversion (VC) methods typically attempt to separate speaker identity and linguistic information into distinct representations, which are then combined to reconstruct the audio. However, effectively disentangling these factors remains challenging, often leading to information loss during training. In this paper, we propose a new approach that leverages synthetic speech data generated by a high-quality, pretrained multispeaker text-to-speech (TTS) model. Specifically, synthetic data pairs that share the same linguistic content but differ in speaker identity are used as input-output pairs to train the voice conversion model. This enables the model to learn a direct mapping between source and target voices, effectively capturing speaker-specific characteristics while preserving linguistic content. Additionally, we introduce a flexible training strategy for any-to-any voice conversion that generalizes well to unseen speakers and new languages, enhancing adaptability and performance in zero-shot scenarios. Our experiments show that our proposed method achieves a 16.35% relative reduction in word error rate and a 5.91% improvement in speaker cosine similarity, outperforming several state-of-the-art methods. Voice conversion samples can be accessed at: https://oovc-emnlp-2025.github.io/

Ankan Mullick, Sombit Bose, Rounak Saha, Ayan Kumar Bhowmick, Aditya Vempaty, Prasenjit Dey, Ravi Kokku, Pawan Goyal, Niloy Ganguly

Analyzing and processing vast amounts of textual data presents significant challenges in efficiently extracting key information.In this paper, we introduce '***Spotlight***’, a novel paradigm for information extraction that produces concise, engaging narratives by highlighting the most compelling aspects of a document. Unlike highlights (fragmented key points) and traditional summaries, which prioritize comprehensive coverage, spotlights selectively emphasize intriguing content to foster deeper reader engagement with the source material. We formally differentiate spotlights from related constructs and support our analysis with a detailed benchmarking study using new datasets curated for this work. To generate high-quality spotlights, we propose a two-stage approach: fine-tuning a large language model on our benchmark data, followed by alignment via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that the resulting model not only identifies key elements with precision but also enhances readability and boosts the engagement value of the original document. Datasets and code are available at https://github.com/ankan2/Spotlight-EMNLP2025.

Khonzoda Umarova, Lillian Lee, Laerdon Kim

Methods for lexical semantic-change detection quantify changes in the meaning of words over time. Prior methods have excelled on established benchmarks consisting of pre-selected target words, chosen ahead of time due to the prohibitive cost of manually annotating all words. However, performance measured on small curated wordsets cannot reveal how well these methods perform at discovering semantic changes among the full corpus vocabulary, which is the actual end goal for many applications. In this paper, we implement a top-k setup to evaluate semantic-change discovery despite lacking complete annotations. (At the same time, we also extend the annotations in the commonly used LiverpoolFC and SemEval-EN benchmarks by 85% and 90%, respectively). We deploy our evaluation setup on a battery of semantic-change detection methods under multiple variations. We find that when presented with a natural distribution of instances, all the methods struggle at ranking known large changes higher than other words in the vocabulary. Furthermore, we manually verify that the majority of words with high detected-change scores in LiverpoolFC do not actually experience meaning changes. In fact, for most of the methods, less than a half of the highest-ranked changes were determined to have changed in meaning. Given the large performance discrepancies between existing benchmark results and discovery “in the wild”, we recommend that researchers direct more attention to semantic-change discovery and include it in their suite of evaluations. Our annotations and code for running evaluations are available at https://github.com/khonzoda/semantic-change-discovery-emnlp2025.

Ankan Mullick, Saransh Sharma, Abhik Jana, Pawan Goyal

The rise of multimodal data, integrating text, audio, and visuals, has created new opportunities for studying multimodal tasks such as intent detection. This work investigates the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) and non-LLMs, including text-only and multimodal models, in the multimodal intent detection task. Our study reveals that Mistral-7B, a text-only LLM, outperforms most competitive multimodal models by approximately 9% on MIntRec-1 and 4% on MIntRec2.0 dataset. This performance advantage comes from a strong textual bias in these datasets, where over 90% of the samples require textual input, either alone or in combination with other modalities, for correct classification. We confirm the modality bias of these datasets via human evaluation, too. Next, we propose a framework to debias the datasets, and upon debiasing, more than 70% of the samples in MIntRec-1 and more than 50% in MIntRec2.0 get removed, resulting in significant performance degradation across all models, with smaller multimodal fusion models being the most affected with an accuracy drop of over 50 - 60%. Further, we analyze the context-specific relevance of different modalities through empirical analysis. Our findings highlight the challenges posed by modality bias in multimodal intent datasets and emphasize the need for unbiased datasets to evaluate multimodal models effectively. We release both the code and the dataset used for this work at https://github.com/Text-Takes-Over-EMNLP-2025/MultiModal-Intent-EMNLP-2025.

Wonbin Kweon, SeongKu Kang, Runchu Tian, Pengcheng Jiang, Jiawei Han, Hwanjo Yu

The effectiveness of in-context learning relies heavily on selecting demonstrations that provide all the necessary information for a given test input.To achieve this, it is crucial to identify and cover fine-grained knowledge requirements. However, prior methods often retrieve demonstrations based solely on embedding similarity or generation probability, resulting in irrelevant or redundant examples.In this paper, we propose TopicK, a topic coverage-based retrieval framework that selects demonstrations to comprehensively cover topic-level knowledge relevant to both the test input and the model.Specifically, TopicK estimates the topics required by the input and assesses the model’s knowledge on those topics.TopicK then iteratively selects demonstrations that introduce previously uncovered required topics, in which the model exhibits low topical knowledge.We validate the effectiveness of TopicK through extensive experiments across various datasets and both open- and closed-source LLMs.Our source code is available at https://github.com/WonbinKweon/TopicK_EMNLP2025.

Runjia Zeng, Guangyan Sun, Qifan Wang, Tong Geng, Sohail Dianat, Xiaotian Han, Raghuveer Rao, Xueling Zhang, Cheng Han, Lifu Huang 等

Considering deep neural networks as manifold mappers, the pretrain-then-fine-tune paradigm can be interpreted as a two-stage process: pretrain establishes a broad knowledge base, and fine-tune adjusts the model parameters to activate specific neural pathways to align with the target manifold. Although prior fine-tuning approaches demonstrate success, their rigid parameter space limits their ability to dynamically activate appropriate neural pathways, rendering them ill-equipped to adapt flexibly to the diverse and evolving data distributions. In light of this view, we propose a novel approach, Mixture of Expert Prompt Tuning (MEPT), as an effective and efficient manifold-mapping framework. MEPT leverages the Mixture of Experts architecture by integrating multiple prompt experts to adaptively learn diverse and non-stationary data distributions. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that MEPT outperforms several state-of-the-art parameter efficient baselines on SuperGLUE, achieving notable improvements in mean accuracy (e.g., 1.94%) while significantly reducing activated prompts by 79.25%. The effectiveness of MEPT is further supported by theoretical insights from manifold learning and validated through neural activation pathway visualization results. Our code is avaliable at https://runjia.tech/emnlp_mept/.

Yilin Jiang, Mingzi Zhang, Sheng Jin, Zengyi Yu, Xiangjie Kong, Binghao Tu

Simulating Professions (SP) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to emulate professional roles. However, comprehensive psychological and ethical evaluation in these contexts remains lacking. This paper introduces EMNLP, an Educator-role Moral and Normative LLMs Profiling framework for personality profiling, moral development stage measurement, and ethical risk under soft prompt injection. EMNLP extends existing scales and constructs 88 teacher-specific moral dilemmas, enabling profession-oriented comparison with human teachers. A targeted soft prompt injection set evaluates compliance and vulnerability in teacher SP. Experiments on 14 LLMs show teacher-role LLMs exhibit more idealized and polarized personalities than human teachers, excel in abstract moral reasoning, but struggle with emotionally complex situations. Models with stronger reasoning are more vulnerable to harmful prompt injection, revealing a paradox between capability and safety. The model temperature and other hyperparameters have limited influence except in some risk behaviors. This paper presents the first benchmark to assess ethical and psychological alignment of teacher-role LLMs for educational AI. Resources are available at https://e-m-n-l-p.github.io/.

Yu Zhang

We investigate the impacts of NLP research published in top-tier conferences (i.e., ACL, EMNLP, and NAACL) from 1979 to 2024. By analyzing citations from research articles and external sources such as patents, media, and policy documents, we examine how different NLP topics are consumed both within the academic community and by the broader public. Our findings reveal that language modeling has the widest internal and external influence, while linguistic foundations have lower impacts. We also observe that internal and external impacts generally align, but topics like ethics, bias, and fairness show significant attention in policy documents with much fewer academic citations. Additionally, external domains exhibit distinct preferences, with patents focusing on practical NLP applications and media and policy documents engaging more with the societal implications of NLP models.

Social Aspects · Trustworthy Machine Learning

Pratyush Maini, Anshuman Suri

At EMNLP 2024, the [Best Paper Award](https://x.com/emnlpmeeting/status/1857176180128198695/photo/1) was given to **"Pretraining Data Detection for Large Language Models: A Divergence-based Calibration Method"**. The paper addresses Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs), a key issue in machine learning related to privacy. The authors propose a new calibration method and introduce **PatentMIA**, a benchmark utilizing temporally shifted patent data to validate their approach. The method initially seems promising: it recalibrates model probabilities using a divergence metric between the outputs of a target model and a token-frequency map derived from auxiliary data, claiming improved detection of member and non-member samples. However, upon closer examination, we identified significant shortcomings in both the experimental design and evaluation methodology. In this post, we critically analyze the paper and its broader implications.

Roxanne El Baff, Khalid Al Khatib, Milad Alshomary, Kai Konen, Benno Stein, Henning Wachsmuth

Different political ideologies (e.g., liberal and conservative Americans) hold different worldviews, which leads to opposing stances on different issues (e.g., gun control) and, thereby, fostering societal polarization. Arguments are a means of bringing the perspectives of people with different ideologies closer together, depending on how well they reach their audience. In this paper, we study how to computationally turn ineffective arguments into effective arguments for people with certain ideologies by using instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs), looking closely at style features. For development and evaluation, we collect ineffective arguments per ideology from debate.org, and we generate about 30k, which we rewrite using three LLM methods tailored to our task: zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, and LLM steering. Our experiments provide evidence that LLMs naturally improve argument effectiveness for liberals. Our LLM-based and human evaluation show a clear preference towards the rewritten arguments. Code and link to the data are available here: https://github.com/roxanneelbaff/emnlp2024-iesta.

Tim Hagen, Harrisen Scells, Martin Potthast

The most commonly used transformers for retrieval at present, BERT and T5, have been shown not to be robust to query variations such as typos or paraphrases. Although this is an important prerequisite for their practicality, this problem has hardly been investigated. More recent large language models (LLMs), including instruction-tuned LLMs, have not been analyzed yet, and only one study looks beyond typos. We close this gap by reproducing this study and extending it with a systematic analysis of more recent models, including Sentence-BERT, CharacterBERT, E5-Mistral, AnglE, and Ada v2. We further investigate if instruct-LLMs can be prompted for robustness. Our results are mixed in that the previously observed robustness issues for cross-encoders also apply to bi-encoders that use much larger LLMs, albeit to a lesser extent. While further LLM scaling may improve their embeddings, their cost-effective use for all but large deployments is limited. Training data that includes query variations allows LLMs to be fine-tuned for more robustness, but focusing on a single category of query variation may even degrade the effectiveness on others. Our code, results, and artifacts can be found at https://github.com/webis-de/EMNLP-24

Tuan Dung Nguyen, Thanh Trung Huynh, Minh Hieu Phan, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Phi Le Nguyen

The increasing availability of multimodal data from electronic health records (EHR) has paved the way for deep learning methods to improve diagnosis accuracy. However, deep learning models are data-driven, requiring large-scale datasets to achieve high generalizability. Inspired by how human experts leverage reasoning for medical diagnosis, we propose CARER, a novel health risk prediction framework, that enhances deep learning models with clinical rationales derived from medically proficient Large Language Models (LLMs). In addition, we provide a cross-view alignment loss which aligns the “local” view from the patient’s health status with the “global” view from the external LLM’s clinical reasoning to boost the mutual feature learning. Through extensive experiments on two predictive tasks using two popular EHR datasets, our CARER’s significantly exceeds the performance of state-of-the-art models by up to 11.2%, especially in improving data efficiency and generalizability. Our code is available at https://github.com/tuandung2812/CARER-EMNLP-2024

Marius Mosbach, Vagrant Gautam, Tomás Vergara Browne, Dietrich Klakow, Mor Geva

Interpretability and analysis (IA) research is a growing subfield within NLP with the goal of developing a deeper understanding of the behavior or inner workings of NLP systems and methods. Despite growing interest in the subfield, a criticism of this work is that it lacks actionable insights and therefore has little impact on NLP. In this paper, we seek to quantify the impact of IA research on the broader field of NLP. We approach this with a mixed-methods analysis of: (1) a citation graph of 185K+ papers built from all papers published at ACL and EMNLP conferences from 2018 to 2023, and their references and citations, and (2) a survey of 138 members of the NLP community. Our quantitative results show that IA work is well-cited outside of IA, and central in the NLP citation graph. Through qualitative analysis of survey responses and manual annotation of 556 papers, we find that NLP researchers build on findings from IA work and perceive it as important for progress in NLP, multiple subfields, and rely on its findings and terminology for their own work. Many novel methods are proposed based on IA findings and highly influenced by them, but highly influential non-IA work cites IA findings without being driven by them. We end by summarizing what is missing in IA work today and provide a call to action, to pave the way for a more impactful future of IA research.

Deep Learning · Representation Learning

Sho Yokoi, Han Bao, Hiroto Kurita, Hidetoshi Shimodaira

The word embedding space in neural models is skewed, and correcting this can improve task performance.We point out that most approaches for modeling, correcting, and measuring the symmetry of an embedding space implicitly assume that the word frequencies are *uniform*; in reality, word frequencies follow a highly non-uniform distribution, known as *Zipf's law*.Surprisingly, simply performing PCA whitening weighted by the empirical word frequency that follows Zipf's law significantly improves task performance, surpassing established baselines.From a theoretical perspective, both our approach and existing methods can be clearly categorized: word representations are distributed according to an exponential family with either uniform or Zipfian base measures.By adopting the latter approach, we can naturally emphasize informative low-frequency words in terms of their vector norm, which becomes evident from the information-geometric perspective (Oyama et al., EMNLP 2023), and in terms of the loss functions for imbalanced classification (Menon et al. ICLR 2021).Additionally, our theory corroborates that popular natural language processing methods, such as skip-gram negative sampling (Mikolov et al., NIPS 2013), WhiteningBERT (Huang et al., Findings of EMNLP 2021), and headless language models (Godey et al., ICLR 2024), work well just because their word embeddings encode the empirical word frequency into the underlying probabilistic model.

Will Aitken, Mohamed Abdalla, Karen Rudie, Catherine Stinson

Impressive performance of pre-trained models has garnered public attention and made news headlines in recent years. Almost always, these models are produced by or in collaboration with industry. Using them is critical for competing on natural language processing (NLP) benchmarks and correspondingly to stay relevant in NLP research. We surveyed 100 papers published at EMNLP 2022 to determine the degree to which researchers rely on industry models, other artifacts, and contributions to publish in prestigious NLP venues and found that the ratio of their citation is at least three times greater than what would be expected. Our work serves as a scaffold to enable future researchers to more accurately address whether: 1) Collaboration with industry is still collaboration in the absence of an alternative or 2) if NLP inquiry has been captured by the motivations and research direction of private corporations.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency and Interpretability

Weixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, Haley Lepp, Hancheng Cao, Xuandong Zhao, Lingjiao Chen, Haotian Ye, Sheng Liu, Zhi Huang 等

We present an approach for estimating the fraction of text in a large corpus which is likely to be substantially modified or produced by a large language model (LLM). Our maximum likelihood model leverages expert-written and AI-generated reference texts to accurately and efficiently examine real-world LLM-use at the corpus level. We apply this approach to a case study of scientific peer review in AI conferences that took place after the release of ChatGPT: *ICLR* 2024, *NeurIPS* 2023, *CoRL* 2023 and *EMNLP* 2023. Our results suggest that between 6.5% and 16.9% of text submitted as peer reviews to these conferences could have been substantially modified by LLMs, i.e. beyond spell-checking or minor writing updates. The circumstances in which generated text occurs offer insight into user behavior: the estimated fraction of LLM-generated text is higher in reviews which report lower confidence, were submitted close to the deadline, and from reviewers who are less likely to respond to author rebuttals. We also observe corpus-level trends in generated text which may be too subtle to detect at the individual level, and discuss the implications of such trends on peer review. We call for future interdisciplinary work to examine how LLM use is changing our information and knowledge practices.

Weixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, Haley Lepp, Hancheng Cao, Xuandong Zhao, Lingjiao Chen, Haotian Ye, Sheng Liu, Zhi Huang 等

We present an approach for estimating the fraction of text in a large corpus which is likely to be substantially modified or produced by a large language model (LLM). Our maximum likelihood model leverages expert-written and AI-generated reference texts to accurately and efficiently examine real-world LLM-use at the corpus level. We apply this approach to a case study of scientific peer review in AI conferences that took place after the release of ChatGPT: *ICLR* 2024, *NeurIPS* 2023, *CoRL* 2023 and *EMNLP* 2023. Our results suggest that between 6.5% and 16.9% of text submitted as peer reviews to these conferences could have been substantially modified by LLMs, i.e. beyond spell-checking or minor writing updates. The circumstances in which generated text occurs offer insight into user behavior: the estimated fraction of LLM-generated text is higher in reviews which report lower confidence, were submitted close to the deadline, and from reviewers who are less likely to respond to author rebuttals. We also observe corpus-level trends in generated text which may be too subtle to detect at the individual level, and discuss the implications of such trends on peer review. We call for future interdisciplinary work to examine how LLM use is changing our information and knowledge practices.