Commonsense reasoning in multimodal contexts remains a foundational challenge in artificial intelligence. We introduce Multimodal UNcommonsense (MUN), a benchmark designed to evaluate models’ ability to handle scenarios that deviate from typical visual or contextual expectations. MUN pairs visual scenes with surprising or unlikely outcomes described in natural language, prompting models to either rationalize seemingly odd images using everyday logic or uncover unexpected interpretations in ordinary scenes. To support this task, we propose a retrieval-based in-context learning (R-ICL) framework that transfers reasoning capabilities from larger models to smaller ones without additional training. Leveraging a novel Multimodal Ensemble Retriever (MER), our method identifies semantically relevant exemplars even when image and text pairs are deliberately discordant. Experiments show an average improvement of 8.3% over baseline ICL methods, highlighting the effectiveness of R-ICL in low-frequency, atypical settings. MUN opens new directions for evaluating and improving visual-language models’ robustness and adaptability in real-world, culturally diverse, and non-prototypical scenarios.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 7,537 篇学术成果中精准定位
Investigating the Impact of Conceptual Metaphors on LLM-based NLI through Shapley Interactions
PDF ↗Metaphorical language is prevalent in everyday communication, often used unconsciously, as in “rising crime.” While LLMs excel at identifying metaphors in text, they struggle with downstream tasks that implicitly require correct metaphor interpretation, such as natural language inference (NLI). This work explores how LLMs perform on NLI with metaphorical input. Particularly, we investigate whether incorporating conceptual metaphors (source and target domains) enhances performance in zero-shot and few-shot settings. Our contributions are two-fold: (1) we extend metaphorical texts in an existing NLI dataset by source and target domains, and (2) we conduct an ablation study using Shapley values and interactions to assess the extent to which LLMs interpret metaphorical language correctly in NLI. Our results indicate that incorporating conceptual metaphors often improves task performance.
PhysicsArena: The First Multimodal Physics Reasoning Benchmark Exploring Variable, Process, and Solution Dimensions
PDF ↗Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in diverse reasoning tasks, yet their application to complex physics reasoning remains underexplored. Physics reasoning presents unique challenges, requiring grounding in physical conditions and the interpretation of multimodal information. Current physics benchmarks are limited, often focusing on text-only inputs or solely on problem-solving, thereby overlooking the critical intermediate steps of variable identification and process formulation. To address these limitations, we introduce **PhysicsArena, the first multimodal physics reasoning benchmark designed to holistically evaluate MLLMs across three critical dimensions: variable identification, physical process formulation, and solution derivation.** PhysicsArena aims to provide a comprehensive platform for assessing and advancing the multimodal physics reasoning abilities of MLLMs.
Diving into Mitigating Hallucinations from a Vision Perspective for Large Vision-Language Models
PDF ↗Object hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) significantly impede their real-world applicability. As the primary component for accurately interpreting visual information, the choice of visual encoder is pivotal. We hypothesize that the diverse training paradigms employed by different visual encoders instill them with distinct inductive biases, which leads to their diverse hallucination performances. Existing benchmarks typically focus on coarse-grained hallucination detection and fail to capture the diverse hallucinations elaborated in our hypothesis. To systematically analyze these effects, we introduce VHBench-10, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LVLMs across ten fine-grained hallucination categories. Our evaluations confirm encoders exhibit unique hallucination characteristics. Building on these insights and the suboptimality of simple feature fusion, we propose VisionWeaver, a novel Context-Aware Routing Network. It employs global visual features to generate routing signals, dynamically aggregating visual features from multiple specialized experts. Comprehensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of VisionWeaver in significantly reducing hallucinations and improving overall model performance. Our code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/whwangovo/VisionWeaver.
In high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance, effective decision-making demands not just accurate outcomes but transparent and explainable reasoning. However, current language models often lack the structured deliberation needed for such tasks, instead generating decisions and justifications in a disconnected, post-hoc manner. To address this, we propose DecisionFlow, a novel decision modeling framework that guides models to reason over structured representations of actions, attributes, and constraints. Rather than predicting answers directly from prompts, DecisionFlow builds a semantically grounded decision space and infers a latent utility function to evaluate trade-offs in a transparent, utility-driven manner. This process produces decisions tightly coupled with interpretable rationales reflecting the model’s reasoning. Empirical results on two high-stakes benchmarks show that DecisionFlow not only achieves up to 30% accuracy gains over strong prompting baselines but also enhances alignment in outcomes. Our work is a critical step toward integrating symbolic reasoning with LLMs, enabling more accountable, explainable, and reliable LLM decision support systems. Code and data are at https://github.com/xiusic/DecisionFlow.
Explainable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis on State-Aware Reasoning Dynamics
PDF ↗Recent advances in chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting have demonstrated the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform multi-step reasoning. While prior work focuses on improving CoT generation quality or attributing token-level importance, we propose a novel framework to structurally analyze the latent dynamics of CoT trajectories for interpretability. Our method segments generated CoT into discrete reasoning steps, abstracts each step into a spectral embedding based on the eigenvalues of token-level Gram matrices, and clusters these embeddings into semantically meaningful latent states. We model the global evolution of reasoning as a first-order Markov chain over latent clusters, yielding interpretable transition structures. Through t-SNE visualizations and Monte Carlo rollouts, we uncover consistent trajectories across tasks and models, supporting the hypothesis that LLM reasoning follows globally coherent yet abstract paths.
DrKGC: Dynamic Subgraph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Knowledge Graph Completion across General and Biomedical Domains
PDF ↗Knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to predict missing triples in knowledge graphs (KGs) by leveraging existing triples and textual information. Recently, generative large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly employed for graph tasks. However, current approaches typically encode graph context in textual form, which fails to fully exploit the potential of LLMs for perceiving and reasoning about graph structures. To address this limitation, we propose DrKGC (Dynamic Subgraph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Knowledge Graph Completion). DrKGC employs a flexible lightweight model training strategy to learn structural embeddings and logical rules within the KG. It then leverages a novel bottom-up graph retrieval method to extract a subgraph for each query guided by the learned rules. Finally, a graph convolutional network (GCN) adapter uses the retrieved subgraph to enhance the structural embeddings, which are then integrated into the prompt for effective LLM fine-tuning. Experimental results on two general domain benchmark datasets and two biomedical datasets demonstrate the superior performance of DrKGC. Furthermore, a realistic case study in the biomedical domain highlights its interpretability and practical utility.
HetGCoT: Heterogeneous Graph-Enhanced Chain-of-Thought LLM Reasoning for Academic Question Answering
PDF ↗Academic question answering (QA) in heterogeneous scholarly networks presents unique challenges requiring both structural understanding and interpretable reasoning. While graph neural networks (GNNs) capture structured graph information and large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in semantic comprehension, current approaches lack integration at the reasoning level. We propose HetGCoT, a framework enabling LLMs to effectively leverage and learn information from graphs to reason interpretable academic QA results. Our framework introduces three technical contributions: (1) a framework that transforms heterogeneous graph structural information into LLM-processable reasoning chains, (2) an adaptive metapath selection mechanism identifying relevant subgraphs for specific queries, and (3) a multi-step reasoning strategy systematically incorporating graph contexts into the reasoning process. Experiments on OpenAlex and DBLP datasets show our approach outperforms all sota baselines. The framework demonstrates adaptability across different LLM architectures and applicability to various scholarly question answering tasks.
Existing metrics often lack the granularity and interpretability to capture nuanced clinical differences between candidate and ground-truth radiology reports, resulting in suboptimal evaluation. We introduce a **Cl**inically grounded tabular framework with **E**xpert-curated labels and **A**ttribute-level comparison for **R**adiology report evaluation (**CLEAR**). CLEAR not only examines whether a report can accurately identify the presence or absence of medical conditions, but it also assesses whether the report can precisely describe each positively identified condition across five key attributes: first occurrence, change, severity, descriptive location, and recommendation. Compared with prior works, CLEAR’s multi-dimensional, attribute-level outputs enable a more comprehensive and clinically interpretable evaluation of report quality. Additionally, to measure the clinical alignment of CLEAR, we collaborated with five board-certified radiologists to develop **CLEAR-Bench**, a dataset of 100 chest radiograph reports from MIMIC-CXR, annotated across 6 curated attributes and 13 CheXpert conditions. Our experiments demonstrated that CLEAR achieves high accuracy in extracting clinical attributes and provides automated metrics that are strongly aligned with clinical judgment.
Responsible use of Authorship Verification (AV) systems not only requires high accuracy but also interpretable solutions. More importantly, for systems to be used to make decisions with real-world consequences requires the model’s prediction to be explainable using interpretable features that can be traced to the original texts. Neural methods achieve high accuracies, but their representations lack direct interpretability. Furthermore, LLM predictions cannot be explained faithfully – if there is an explanation given for a prediction, it doesn’t represent the reasoning process behind the model’s prediction. In this paper, we introduce Residualized Similarity (RS), a novel method that supplements systems using interpretable features with a neural network to improve their performance while maintaining interpretability. Authorship verification is fundamentally a similarity task, where the goal is to measure how alike two documents are. The key idea is to use the neural network to predict a similarity residual, i.e. the error in the similarity predicted by the interpretable system. Our evaluation across four datasets shows that not only can we match the performance of state-of-the-art authorship verification models, but we can show how and to what degree the final prediction is faithful and interpretable.
MFTCXplain: A Multilingual Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating the Moral Reasoning of LLMs through Multi-hop Hate Speech Explanation
PDF ↗Ensuring the moral reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a growing concern as these systems are used in socially sensitive tasks. Nevertheless, current evaluation benchmarks present two major shortcomings: a lack of annotations that justify moral classifications, which limits transparency and interpretability; and a predominant focus on English, which constrains the assessment of moral reasoning across diverse cultural settings. In this paper, we introduce MFTCXplain, a multilingual benchmark dataset for evaluating the moral reasoning of LLMs via multi-hop hate speech explanations using the Moral Foundations Theory. MFTCXplain comprises 3,000 tweets across Portuguese, Italian, Persian, and English, annotated with binary hate speech labels, moral categories, and text span-level rationales. Our results show a misalignment between LLM outputs and human annotations in moral reasoning tasks. While LLMs perform well in hate speech detection (F1 up to 0.836), their ability to predict moral sentiments is notably weak (F1 < 0.35). Furthermore, rationale alignment remains limited mainly in underrepresented languages. Our findings show the limited capacity of current LLMs to internalize and reflect human moral reasoning.
Cognitive science offers rich theories of learning and communication, yet these are often difficult to operationalize at scale. We demonstrate how natural language processing can bridge this gap by applying psycholinguistic theories of discourse to real-world educational data. We investigate linguistic alignment – the convergence of conversational partners’ word choice, grammar, and meaning – in a longitudinal dataset of real-world tutoring interactions and associated student test scores. We examine (1) the extent of alignment, (2) role-based patterns among tutors and students, and (3) the relationship between alignment and learning outcomes. We find that both tutors and students exhibit lexical, syntactic, and semantic alignment, with tutors aligning more strongly to students. Crucially, tutor lexical alignment predicts student learning gains, while student lexical alignment negatively predicts them. As a lightweight, interpretable metric, linguistic alignment offers practical applications in intelligent tutoring systems, educator dashboards, and tutor training.
Aggregating multiple annotations into a single ground truth label may hide valuable insights into annotator disagreement, particularly in tasks where subjectivity plays a crucial role. In this work, we explore methods for identifying subjectivity in recognizing the human values that motivate arguments. We evaluate two main approaches: inferring subjectivity through value prediction vs. directly identifying subjectivity. Our experiments show that direct subjectivity identification significantly improves the model performance of flagging subjective arguments. Furthermore, combining contrastive loss with binary cross-entropy loss does not improve performance but reduces the dependency on per-label subjectivity. Our proposed methods can help identify arguments that individuals may interpret differently, fostering a more nuanced annotation process.
An LLM-based Temporal-spatial Data Generation and Fusion Approach for Early Detection of Late Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (LOAD) Stagings Especially in Chinese and English-speaking Populations
PDF ↗Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), the 7th leading cause of death globally, demands scalable methods for early detection. While speech-based diagnostics offer promise, existing approaches struggle with temporal-spatial (T-S) challenges in capturing subtle linguistic shifts across different disease stages (temporal) and in adapting to cross-linguistic variability (spatial). This study introduces a novel Large Language Model (LLM)-driven T-S fusion framework that integrates multilingual LLMs, contrastive learning, and interpretable marker discovery to revolutionize Late Onset AD (LOAD) detection. Our key innovations include: (1) T-S Data Imputation: Leveraging LLMs to generate synthetic speech transcripts across different LOAD stages (NC, Normal Control; eMCI, early Mild Cognitive Impairment; lMCI, late Mild Cognitive Impairment; AD) and languages (Chinese, English, Spanish), addressing data scarcity while preserving clinical relevance (expert validation: 86% agreement with LLM-generated labels). (2) T-S Transformer with Contrastive Learning: A multilingual model that disentangles stage-specific (temporal) and language-specific (spatial) patterns, achieving a notable improvement of 10.9–24.7% in F1-score over existing baselines. (3) Cross-Linguistic Marker Discovery: Identifying language-agnostic markers and language-specific patterns to enhance interpretability for clinical adoption. By unifying temporal LOAD stages and spatial diversity, our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance in early LOAD detection while enabling cross-linguistic diagnostics. This study bridges NLP and clinical neuroscience, demonstrating LLMs’ potential to amplify limited biomedical data and advance equitable healthcare AI.
In Semantic Change Detection (SCD), it is a common problem to obtain embeddings that are both interpretable and high-performing. However, improving interpretability often leads to a loss in the SCD performance, and vice versa. To address this problem, we propose SCDTour, a method that orders and merges interpretable axes to alleviate the performance degradation of SCD. SCDTour considers both (a) semantic similarity between axes in the embedding space, as well as (b) the degree to which each axis contributes to semantic change. Experimental results show that SCDTour preserves performance in semantic change detection while maintaining high interpretability. Moreover, agglomerating the sorted axes produces a more refined set of word senses, which achieves comparable or improved performance against the original full-dimensional embeddings in the SCD task. These findings demonstrate that SCDTour effectively balances interpretability and SCD performance, enabling meaningful interpretation of semantic shifts through a small number of refined axes.
We know from prior work that LLMs encode social biases, and that this manifests in clinical tasks. In this work we adopt tools from mechanistic interpretability to unveil sociodemographic representations and biases within LLMs in the context of healthcare. Specifically, we ask: Can we identify activations within LLMs that encode sociodemographic information (e.g., gender, race)? We find that, in three open weight LLMs, gender information is highly localized in MLP layers and can be reliably manipulated at inference time via patching. Such interventions can surgically alter generated clinical vignettes for specific conditions, and also influence downstream clinical predictions which correlate with gender, e.g., patient risk of depression. We find that representation of patient race is somewhat more distributed, but can also be intervened upon, to a degree. To our knowledge, this is the first application of mechanistic interpretability methods to LLMs for healthcare.
As machine learning (ML) application continues to expand across diverse fields, there is a rising demand for ML code generation. In this paper, we aim at a critical research question: Can machines autonomously generate ML code for sophisticated, human-designed algorithms or solutions? To answer this question, we introduce a novel benchmark, MLAlgo-Bench, which includes two challenging tasks: 1) Generating code for ML algorithms including both traditional ML and modern deep learning-based methods, and 2) Giving humans solution sketches, writing ML code for solving practical tasks in Kaggle competitions. This benchmark is unique in its focus on the challenges of interpreting intricate human instructions and producing multi-step, high-complexity code, offering a rigorous test for current Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities. We introduce an automatic evaluation framework with comprehensive metrics such as task pass rate, relative performance metric, and time overhead. Currently, the top-performing models (Claude3.5-Sonet) achieve a 48.8% task completion rate on realizing machine learning algorithms, and a 21.6% rate for completing Kaggle competitions. Further analysis suggests substantial room for improvement.
This is not a Disimprovement: Improving Negation Reasoning in Large Language Models via Prompt Engineering
PDF ↗Negation reasoning remains a challenge for large language models (LLMs), often causing incorrect interpretations of negated statements. In this study, we analyze various LLMs for their handling of negation and propose two genres of prompts (*Warning-based* and *Persona-based*), which improve overall absolute accuracy by up to 3.17% and distractor negation accuracy by up to 25.14% over most competitive baselines. Next, we assess the robustness of LLMs by reordering prompts while preserving meaning, observing instability linked to positional encoding schemes. Further, we introduce a negative token attention score (NTAS) to quantify attention to negation words. From the comprehensive analysis, we point out that within a specific LLM family, the performance of a model (measured using accuracy) correlates more with NTAS than with model size. The code is publicly available: [https://github.com/Joshua-Dias-Barreto/This-is-not-a-Disimprovement](https://github.com/Joshua-Dias-Barreto/This-is-not-a-Disimprovement)
Understanding humor is a core aspect of social intelligence, yet it remains a significant challenge for Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). We introduce PixelHumor, a benchmark dataset of 2,800 annotated multi-panel comics designed to evaluate LMMs’ ability to interpret multimodal humor and recognize narrative sequences. Experiments with state-of-the-art LMMs reveal substantial gaps: for instance, top models achieve only 61% accuracy in panel sequencing, far below human performance. This underscores critical limitations in current models’ integration of visual and textual cues for coherent narrative and humor understanding. By providing a rigorous framework for evaluating multimodal contextual and narrative reasoning, PixelHumor aims to drive the development of LMMs that better engage in natural, socially aware interactions.
We explore the human motion knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs) through 3D avatar control. Given a motion instruction, we prompt LLMs to first generate a high-level movement plan with consecutive steps (**High-level Planning**), then specify body part positions in each step (**Low-level Planning**), which we linearly interpolate into avatar animations. Using 20 representative motion instructions that cover fundamental movements and balance body part usage, we conduct comprehensive evaluations, including human and automatic scoring of both high-level movement plans and generated animations, as well as automatic comparison with oracle positions in low-level planning. Our findings show that LLMs are strong at interpreting high-level body movements but struggle with precise body part positioning. While decomposing motion queries into atomic components improves planning, LLMs face challenges in multi-step movements involving high-degree-of-freedom body parts. Furthermore, LLMs provide reasonable approximations for general spatial descriptions, but fall short in handling precise spatial specifications. Notably, LLMs demonstrate promise in conceptualizing creative motions and distinguishing culturally specific motion patterns.