While various multimodal multi-image evaluation datasets have been emerged, but these datasets are primarily based on English, and there has yet to be a Chinese multi-image dataset. To fill this gap, we introduce RealBench, the first Chinese multimodal multi-image dataset, which contains 9393 samples and 69910 images. RealBench distinguishes itself by incorporating real user-generated content, ensuring high relevance to real-world applications. Additionally, the dataset covers a wide variety of scenes, image resolutions, and image structures, further increasing the difficulty of multi-image understanding. Ultimately, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of RealBench using 21 multimodal LLMs of different sizes, including closed-source models that support multi-image inputs as well as open-source visual and video models. The experimental results indicate that even the most powerful closed-source models still face challenges when handling multi-image Chinese scenarios. Moreover, there remains a noticeable performance gap of around 71.8% on average between open-source visual/video models and closed-source models. These results show that RealBench provides an important research foundation for further exploring multi-image understanding capabilities in the Chinese context. Our datasets will be publicly available.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 12,319 篇学术成果中精准定位
LLM-based optimization has shown remarkable potential in improving agentic systems. However, the conventional approach of prompting LLM-based generative optimizer with the trajectories on the whole training dataset in a single pass becomes untenable as datasets grow, leading to context window overflow and degraded pattern recognition. To address these challenges, we propose Fine-grained Generative Optimization (FGO), a scalable framework that divides large optimization tasks into manageable subsets, performs targeted optimizations, and systematically combines optimized components through progressive merging.Evaluation across ALFWorld, LogisticsQA, and GAIA benchmarks demonstrates that FGO outperforms conventional approach by 1.6-8.6% while reducing average prompt token consumption by 56.3%. Our framework provides a practical solution for scaling up LLM-based generative optimization of increasingly sophisticated agentic systems. Further analysis demonstrates that FGO achieves the most consistent performance gain in all training dataset sizes, showcasing its scalability and efficiency.
Robust evaluation in the presence of linguistic variation is key to understanding the generalization capabilities of Natural Language to SQL (NL2SQL) models, yet existing benchmarks rarely address this factor in a systematic or controlled manner. We propose a novel schema-aligned paraphrasing framework that leverages SQL-to-NL (SQL2NL) to automatically generate semantically equivalent, lexically diverse queries while maintaining alignment with the original schema and intent. This enables the first targeted evaluation of NL2SQL robustness to linguistic variation in isolation-distinct from prior work that primarily investigates ambiguity or schema perturbations. Ouranalysis reveals that state-of-the-art models are far more brittle than standard benchmarks suggest. For example, LLaMa3.3-70B exhibits a 10.23% drop in execution accuracy (from 77.11% to 66.9%) on paraphrased Spider queries, while LLaMa3.1-8B suffers an even larger drop of nearly 20% (from 62.9% to 42.5%). Smaller models (e.g., GPT-4o mini) are disproportionately affected. We also find that robustness degradation varies significantly with query complexity, dataset, and domain- highlighting the need for evaluation frameworks that explicitly measure linguistic generalization to ensure reliable performance in real-world settings.
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in reasoning abilities and general natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet their performance on Arabic data, characterized by rich morphology, diverse dialects, and complex script, remains underexplored. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking study of multiple reasoning-focused LLMs, with a special emphasis on the newly introduced DeepSeek models, across a suite of fifteen Arabic NLP tasks. We experiment with various strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning. This allows us to systematically evaluate performance on datasets covering a range of applications to examine their capacity for linguistic reasoning under different levels of complexity. Our experiments reveal several key findings. First, carefully selecting just three in-context examples delivers an average uplift of over 13 F1 points on classification tasks—boosting sentiment analysis from 35.3% to 87.5% and paraphrase detection from 56.1% to 87.0%. Second, reasoning-focused DeepSeek architectures outperform a strong GPT o4-mini baseline by an average of 12 F1 points on complex inference tasks in the zero-shot setting. Third, LoRA-based fine-tuning yields up to an additional 8 points in F1 and BLEU compared to equivalent increases in model scale. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AraReasoner41299
UniRAG: A Unified RAG Framework for Knowledge-Intensive Queries with Decomposition, Break-Down Reasoning, and Iterative Rewriting
PDF ↗Knowledge-intensive queries require accurate answers that are explicitly grounded in retrieved evidence. However, existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches often struggle with query complexity, suffer from propagated reasoning errors, or rely on incomplete or noisy retrieval, limiting their effectiveness. To address these limitations, we introduce UniRAG, a unified RAG framework that integrates entity-grounded query decomposition, break-down reasoning, and iterative query rewriting. Specifically, UniRAG decomposes queries into semantically coherent sub-queries, explicitly verifies retrieved sub-facts through a dedicated reasoning module, and adaptively refines queries based on identified knowledge gaps, significantly improving answer completeness and reliability. Extensive benchmark evaluations on complex question-answering datasets, including multi-hop HotPotQA and 2WikiMultihopQA, biomedical MedMCQA and MedQA, and fact-verification FEVER and SciFact, demonstrate that UniRAG consistently achieves performance improvements across various state-of-the-art LLMs, such as LLaMA-3.1-8B, GPT-3.5-Turbo, and Gemini-1.5-Flash.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a range of natural language processing tasks. However, recent advances demonstrate that further gains—particularly in complex reasoning tasks—require more than merely scaling up model sizes or training data. One promising direction is to enable models to “think” during the reasoning process. Recently, Quiet-STaR significantly improves reasoning by generating token-level thought traces, but incurs substantial inference overhead. In this work, we propose Fast Quiet-STaR, a more efficient reasoning framework that preserves the benefits of token-level reasoning while reducing computational cost. Our method introduces a curriculum-learning-based training strategy that gradually reduces the number of thought tokens, enabling the model to internalize more abstract and concise reasoning processes. We further extend this approach to the standard Next Token Prediction (NTP) setting through reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning, resulting in Fast Quiet-STaR NTP, which eliminates the need for explicit thought token generation during inference. Experiments on four benchmark datasets with Mistral 7B and Qwen2.5 7B demonstrate that Fast Quiet-STaR consistently outperforms Quiet-STaR in terms of average accuracy under the same inference time budget. Notably, Fast Quiet-STaR NTP achieves an average accuracy improvement of 9% on Mistral 7B and 5.7% on Qwen2.5 7B, while maintaining the same inference latency.
Temporal knowledge graph (TKG) reasoning, a central task in temporal knowledge representation, focuses on predicting future facts by leveraging historical temporal contexts. However, current approaches face two major challenges: limited generalization to unseen facts and insufficient interpretability of reasoning processes. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the **D**enoising **L**ogic-based **T**emporal **K**nowledge **G**raph (DLTKG) framework, which employs a denoising diffusion process to complete reasoning tasks by introducing a noise source and a historical conditionguiding mechanism. Specifically, DLTKG constructs fuzzy entity representations by treating historical facts as noise sources, thereby enhancing the semantic associations between entities and the generalization ability for unseen facts. Additionally, the condition-based guidance mechanism, rooted in the relationship evolutionary paths, is designed to improve the interpretability of the reasoning process. Furthermore, we introduce a fine-tuning strategy that optimizes the denoising process by leveraging shortest path information between the head entity and candidate entities. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that DLTKG outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple evaluation metrics. Our code is available at: https://github.com/NEU-IDKE/DLTKG
Sign Language Translation has advanced with deep learning, yet evaluations remain largely signer-dependent, with overlapping signers across train/dev/test. This raises concerns about whether models truly generalise or instead rely on signer-specific regularities. We conduct signer-fold cross-validation on GFSLT-VLP, GASLT, and SignCL—three leading, publicly available, gloss-free SLT models—on CSL-Daily and PHOENIX14T. Under signer-independent evaluation, performance drops sharply: on PHOENIX14T, GFSLT-VLP falls from BLEU-4 21.44 to 3.59 and ROUGE-L 42.49 to 11.89; GASLT from 15.74 to 8.26; and SignCL from 22.74 to 3.66. We also observe that in CSL-Daily many target sentences are performed by multiple signers, so common splits can place identical sentences in both training and test, inflating absolute scores by rewarding recall of recurring sentences rather than genuine generalisation. These findings indicate that signer-dependent evaluation can substantially overestimate SLT capability. We recommend: (1) adopting signer-independent protocols to ensure generalisation to unseen signers; (2) restructuring datasets to include explicit signer-independent, sentence-disjoint splits for consistent benchmarking; and (3) reporting both signer-dependent and signer-independent results together with train–test sentence overlap to improve transparency and comparability.
In-context learning (ICL) effectively conditions large language models (LLMs) for molecular tasks, such as property prediction and molecule captioning, by embedding carefully selected demonstration examples into the input prompt. This approach eliminates the computational overhead of extensive pre-training and fine-tuning. However, current prompt retrieval methods for molecular tasks rely on molecule feature similarity, such as Morgan fingerprints, which do not adequately capture the global molecular and atom-binding relationships. As a result, these methods fail to represent the full complexity of molecular structures during inference. Moreover, medium-sized LLMs, which offer simpler deployment requirements in specialized systems, have remained largely unexplored in the molecular ICL literature. To address these gaps, we propose a self-supervised learning technique, GAMIC (Graph-Aligned Molecular In-Context learning), which aligns global molecular structures, represented by graph neural networks (GNNs), with textual captions (descriptions) while leveraging local feature similarity through Morgan fingerprints. In addition, we introduce a Maximum Marginal Relevance (MMR) based diversity heuristic during retrieval to optimize input prompt demonstration samples. Our experimental findings using diverse benchmark datasets show GAMIC outperforms simple Morgan-based ICL retrieval methods across all tasks by up to 45%. Our code is available at: https://github.com/aliwister/mol-icl.
Digital tool-based agents, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), that invoke external Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) often rely on documentation to understand API functionality. However, such documentation is frequently missing, outdated, privatized, or inconsistent—hindering the development of reliable, general-purpose agents. In this work, we propose a new research direction: learning of API functionality directly from in-context demonstrations. This task is a new paradigm applicable in scenarios without documentation. Using API benchmarks, we collect demonstrations from both expert agents and from self-exploration. To understand what information demonstrations must convey for successful task completion, we extensively study how the number of demonstrations and the use of LLM-generated summaries and evaluations affect the task success rate of the API-based agent. Our experiments across 3 datasets and 6 models show that learning functionality from in-context demonstrations remains a non-trivial challenge, even for state-of-the-art LLMs. We find that providing explicit function calls and natural language critiques significantly improves the agent’s task success rate due to more accurate parameter filling. We analyze failure modes, identify sources of error, and highlight key open challenges for future work in documentation-free, self-improving, API-based agents.
CMT-Eval: A Novel Chinese Multi-turn Dialogue Evaluation Dataset Addressing Real-world Conversational Challenges
PDF ↗Multi-turn dialogue is a key paradigm for interaction between users and Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation benchmarks fail to capture users’ evolving needs and how their diverse conversation styles affect the dialogue flow. To address these limitations, we propose CMT-Eval, the first dedicated dataset for fine-grained evaluation of Chinese multi-turn dialogue systems. Built upon a linguistic theory-driven Speech Act Framework, diverse user personas, and varied conversational challenges, CMT-Eval comprises 596 high-quality dialogues with 4,431 turns, simulating realistic, multifaceted, and challenging conversations. Experiments reveal that models struggle with specific speech acts, user personas, and complex scenarios, highlighting the effectiveness of CMT-Eval in assessing LLMs’ multi-turn dialogue capabilities and providing valuable insights for their enhancement. The dataset, code, and prompts are available at https://github.com/hejaida/CMT-Eval.
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the automation of data science workflows. Yet it remains unclear whether they can critically leverage external domain knowledge as human data scientists do in practice. To answer this question, we introduce AssistedDS (Assisted Data Science), a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate how LLMs handle domain knowledge in tabular prediction tasks. AssistedDS features both synthetic datasets with explicitly known generative mechanisms and real-world Kaggle competitions, each accompanied by curated bundles of helpful and adversarial documents. These documents provide domain-specific insights into data cleaning, feature engineering, and model selection. We assess state-of-the-art LLMs on their ability to discern and apply beneficial versus harmful domain knowledge, evaluating submission validity, information recall, and predictive performance. Our results demonstrate three key findings: (1) LLMs frequently exhibit an uncritical adoption of provided information, significantly impairing their predictive performance when adversarial content is introduced, (2) helpful guidance is often insufficient to counteract the negative influence of adversarial information, and (3) in Kaggle datasets, LLMs often make errors in handling time-series data, applying consistent feature engineering across different folds, and interpreting categorical variables correctly. These findings highlight a substantial gap in current models’ ability to critically evaluate and leverage expert knowledge, underscoring an essential research direction for developing more robust, knowledge-aware automated data science systems. Our data and code are publicly available [here](https://github.com/jeremyxianx/Assisted-DS).
Biology-Instructions: A Dataset and Benchmark for Multi-Omics Sequence Understanding Capability of Large Language Models
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in general domains, but their application to multi-omics biology remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce Biology-Instructions, the first large-scale instruction-tuning dataset for multi-omics biological sequences, including DNA, RNA, proteins, and multi-molecules. This dataset bridges LLMs and complex biological sequence-related tasks, enhancing their versatility and reasoning while maintaining conversational fluency. We also highlight significant limitations of current state-of-the-art LLMs on multi-omics tasks without specialized training. To overcome this, we propose ChatMultiOmics, a strong baseline with a novel three-stage training pipeline, demonstrating superior biological understanding through Biology-Instructions. Both resources are publicly available, paving the way for better integration of LLMs in multi-omics analysis. The Biology-Instructions is publicly available at: https://github.com/hhnqqq/Biology-Instructions.
This paper defines and explores the design space for information extraction (IE) from layout-rich documents using large language models (LLMs). The three core challenges of layout-aware IE with LLMs are 1) data structuring, 2) model engagement, and 3) output refinement. Our study investigates the sub-problems and methods within these core challenges, such as input representation, chunking, prompting, selection of LLMs, and multimodal models. It examines the effect of different design choices through LayIE-LLM, a new, open-source, layout-aware IE test suite, benchmarking against traditional, fine-tuned IE models. The results on two IE datasets show that LLMs require adjustment of the IE pipeline to achieve competitive performance: the optimized configuration found with LayIE-LLM achieves 13.3–37.5 F1 points more than a general-practice baseline configuration using the same LLM. To find a well-working configuration, we develop a one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) method that achieves near-optimal results. Our method is only 0.8–1.8 points lower than the best full factorial exploration with a fraction (~2.8%) of the required computation. Overall, we demonstrate that, if well-configured, general-purpose LLMs match the performance of specialized models, providing a cost-effective, finetuning-free alternative. Our test-suite is available at https://github.com/gayecolakoglu/LayIE-LLM
Large Language Model Agents in Finance: A Survey Bridging Research, Practice, and Real-World Deployment
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to finance, yet challenges remain in aligning their capabilities with real-world institutional demands. In this survey, we provide a systematic, dual-perspective review bridging financial practice and LLM research. From a practitioner-centric standpoint, we introduce a functional taxonomy covering five core financial domains—Data Analysis, Investment Research, Trading, Investment Management, and Risk Management—mapping each to representative tasks, datasets, and institutional constraints. From a research-focused perspective, we analyze key modeling challenges, including numerical reasoning limitations, prompt sensitivity, and lack of real-time adaptability. We comprehensively catalog over 30 financial benchmarks and 20 representative models, and compare them across modalities, tasks, and deployment limitations. Finally, we identify open challenges and outline emerging directions such as continual adaptation, coordination-aware multi-agent systems, and privacy-compliant deployment. We emphasize deeper researcher–practitioner collaboration and transparent model architectures as critical pathways to safer and more scalable AI adoption in finance.
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) significantly enhances long-context Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), yet existing benchmarks focus primarily on English. This leaves low-resource languages without comprehensive evaluation frameworks, limiting their progress in retrieval-based tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce Ko-LongRAG, the first Korean long-context RAG benchmark. Unlike conventional benchmarks that depend on external retrievers, Ko-LongRAG adopts a retrieval-free approach designed around Specialized Content Knowledge (SCK), enabling controlled and high-quality QA pair generation without the need for an extensive retrieval infrastructure. Our evaluation shows that o1 model achieves the highest performance among proprietary models, while EXAONE 3.5 leads among open-sourced models. Additionally, various findings confirm Ko-LongRAG as a reliable benchmark for assessing Korean long-context RAG capabilities and highlight its potential for advancing multilingual RAG research. The dataset and source code will be released publicly.
In modern dialogue systems, the ability to implicitly infer user backgrounds from conversations and leverage this information for personalized assistance is crucial. However, the scarcity of high-quality data remains a fundamental challenge to evaluating and improving this capability. Traditional dataset construction methods are labor-intensive, resource-demanding, and raise privacy concerns. To address these issues, we propose a novel approach for automatic synthetic data generation and introduce the **I**mplicit **P**ersonalized **Dialog**ue (**IP-Dialog**) benchmark along with a training dataset, covering 10 tasks and 12 user attribute types. Additionally, we develop a systematic evaluation framework with four metrics to assess both attribute awareness and reasoning capabilities. We further propose five causal graphs to elucidate models’ reasoning pathways during implicit personalization. Extensive experiments yield insightful observations and prove the reliability of our dataset.
The diversity of human language, shaped by social, cultural, and regional influences, presents significant challenges for natural language processing (NLP) systems. Existing benchmarks often overlook intra-language variations, leaving speakers of non-standard dialects underserved. To address this gap, we introduce EnDive (English Diversity), a benchmark that evaluates seven state-of-the-art (SOTA) large language models (LLMs) across tasks in language understanding, algorithmic reasoning, mathematics, and logic. Our framework translates Standard American English datasets into five underrepresented dialects using few-shot prompting with verified examples from native speakers, and compares these translations against rule-based methods via fluency assessments, preference tests, and semantic similarity metrics. Human evaluations confirm high translation quality, with average scores of at least 6.02/7 for faithfulness, fluency, and formality. By filtering out near-identical translations, we create a challenging dataset that reveals significant performance disparities—models consistently underperform on dialectal inputs compared to Standard American English (SAE). EnDive thus advances dialect-aware NLP by uncovering model biases and promoting more equitable language technologies.
Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. There is a lack of benchmarks to measure comprehensive critical capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across diverse languages, including instruction following, reasoning, code generation, and long context understanding. To bridge this gap, we develop BenchMAX, a multi-way multilingual benchmark that covers 10 diverse tasks, to evaluate LLMs’ general abilities across many languages. To ensure high data quality, each sample is post-edited by three native annotators after machine-translating from English into 16 languages. Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. BenchMAX serves as a comprehensive multilingual evaluation platform, providing a promising test bed to promote the development of multilingual language models. The dataset and code are publicly accessible.
FormosanBench: Benchmarking Low-Resource Austronesian Languages in the Era of Large Language Models
PDF ↗While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks in high-resource languages, their capabilities in low-resource and minority languages remain significantly underexplored. Formosan languages—a subgroup of Austronesian languages spoken in Taiwan—are both linguistically rich and endangered, largely due to the sociolinguistic dominance of Mandarin. In this work, we introduce FormosanBench, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs on low-resource Austronesian languages. It covers three endangered Formosan languages: Atayal, Amis, and Paiwan, across three core NLP tasks: machine translation, automatic speech recognition (ASR), and text summarization. We assess model performance in zero-shot, 10-shot, and fine-tuned settings using FormosanBench. Our results reveal a substantial performance gap between high-resource and Formosan languages. Existing LLMs consistently underperform across all tasks, with 10-shot learning and fine-tuning offering only limited improvements. These findings underscore the urgent need for more inclusive NLP technologies that can effectively support endangered and underrepresented languages. We release our datasets and code to facilitate future research in this direction :https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FormosanBench-DB43/