Large language models often display heterogeneous moral preferences across settings. We study inference-time steering toward a desired ethical framework while preserving general competence. We present Convergent-Divergent Routing, which traces and edits minimal branch points inside transformer blocks where ethical-framework-related pathways first converge and then diverge. Gating non-target branches at these loci blocks the downstream propagation while leaving upstream computations intact. We find that this intervention alone increases targeted ethical-framework reasoning. To achieve fine-grained control, we adapt Common Spatial Patterns to the residual stream and extract, for each branch-point layer, a pair of directions that discriminate between utilitarian and deontological frameworks. We then introduce Dual Logit Calibration, a closed-form, minimum-\ell_2-norm update that moves the residual within this two-dimensional subspace so the resulting directional projections align with user-specified preference weights. Experiments on real-life moral dilemmas show that our method reliably achieves preference calibration and largely preserves general capabilities, outperforming recent baselines while providing an interpretable mechanism.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 100,903 篇学术成果中精准定位
Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective
PDF ↗Large language models (LLMs) operate in two fundamental learning modes – fine-tuning (FT) and in-context learning (ICL) – raising key questions about which mode yields greater language proficiency and whether they differ in their inductive biases. Prior studies comparing FT and ICL have yielded mixed and inconclusive results due to inconsistent experimental setups. To enable a rigorous comparison, we propose a formal language learning task – offering precise language boundaries, controlled string sampling, and no data contamination – and introduce a discriminative test for language proficiency, where an LLM succeeds if it assigns higher generation probability to in-language strings than to out-of-language strings.Empirically, we find that: (a) FT has greater language proficiency than ICL on in-distribution generalization, but both perform equally well on out-of-distribution generalization. (b) Their inductive biases, measured by the correlation in string generation probabilities, are similar when both modes partially learn the language but diverge at higher proficiency levels. (c) Unlike FT, ICL performance differs substantially across models of varying sizes and families and is sensitive to the token vocabulary of the language. Thus, our work demonstrates the promise of formal languages as a controlled testbed for evaluating LLMs, behaviors that are difficult to isolate in natural language datasets. Our source code is available at https://github.com/bishwamittra/formallm.
Existing In-context Learning (ICL) typically assumes the retrieval dataset contains demonstrations for all output label spaces. However, in real-world scenarios, delays in dataset updates or incomplete data annotation may result in the retrieval dataset containing labeled demonstrations for only a subset of the output space. We refer to this phenomenon as an incomplete retrieval dataset and define the in-context learning under this condition as Incomplete In-context Learning (IICL). To address IICL, we propose Iterative Judgments and Integrated Prediction (IJIP), a framework with train-free and train-based variants. For classification, the iterative judgments stage of IJIP reformulates an (m)-class problem into (m) binary tasks, converting IICL into standard ICL. The integrated prediction stage of IJIP then refines results using both the input and initial predictions. We further extend IJIP to text regression and generation, and introduce lightweight variants that reduce computation and token costs. Across six LLMs, seven tasks, and eight datasets, IJIP achieves state-of-the-art results under two incompleteness settings and even outperforms standard ICL with complete labels. IJIP also supports a semi-supervised variant and can serve as a plug-and-play enhancement for existing ICL and zero-shot methods.
Who Plays Which Role When? Communication Role Dynamics for Peer Recognition and Team Performance Prediction
PDF ↗Team roles offer an interpretable lens on collaboration, yet computational studies of roles often rely on domain-specific personas or data-driven clustering rather than theory-grounded taxonomies. We operationalize a taxonomy of eight communication roles grounded in education literature and annotate a corpus of 6,307 Slack messages from 55 students across 18 teams in a semester-long computer science course project. We evaluate whether LLMs can approximate expert labels, enabling scalable, taxonomy-driven role annotation. Using these role labels, we characterize role dynamics over teams’ lifecycles, finding that different roles peak at different moments and that students enact a more diverse set of roles as projects progress. To evaluate the utility of our role constructs, we use them to predict peer recognition, outperforming lexical, conversational, and LLM-prompting baselines. To assess generalizability beyond the educational context, we apply the same role constructs to a public dataset (DeliData) to predict team performance improvement after deliberation, again exceeding prior performance.
Anchoring the Affective Manifold: Learning Canonical and Disentangled Representations via Generative Cross-Modal Alignment
PDF ↗Dominant multimodal emotion recognition paradigms often neglect the intrinsic geometric structure of affect, resulting in representations heavily entangled with non-affective factors. To address this, we propose a Canonical Disentangled Multimodal Generative Framework aimed at recovering the canonical affective manifold from raw data. We explicitly decompose the latent space into a canonical Shared Affective Subspace (z_{vad}) and a Private Modality Subspace (z_{priv}). We facilitate this factorization through Supervised Manifold Anchoring and Cross-Modal Manifold Alignment. Experiments demonstrate that our model effectively disentangles affect from private attributes (e.g., identity), achieving superior robustness in zero-shot cross-domain transfer compared to fully supervised baselines, while enabling controllable emotion generation.
Sign-Language Datasets at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey on Resources, Benchmarks, and Annotation Standards
PDF ↗Sign languages are expressive visual languages used by Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) communities. Despite substantial progress in sign-language recognition, translation, and production, advances remain constrained by fragmented datasets, inconsistent annotations, and limited linguistic coverage. Existing benchmarks often fail to reflect real-world communication needs, and systematic analyses of these limitations remain limited. In this survey, we present a comprehensive index of sign-language datasets, covering 120 resources across 35 sign languages. We analyze key challenges such as modality imbalance, annotation granularity, and signer bias, and outline considerations for future dataset design. We also introduce a 24-field Sign-Language Datasheet and release a public GitHub repository to support standardized documentation and reproducible evaluation. Overall, our work provides a unified and practical foundation for developing inclusive, robust, and scalable sign-language technologies in real-world applications.
Survey Response Generation: Generating Closed-Ended Survey Responses In-Silico with Large Language Models
PDF ↗Many _in-silico_ simulations of human survey responses with large language models (LLMs) focus on generating closed-ended survey responses, whereas LLMs are typically trained to generate open-ended text instead. Previous research has used a diverse range of methods for generating closed-ended survey responses with LLMs and a standard practice remains to be identified. In this paper, we systematically investigate the impact that various **Survey Response Generation Methods** have on predicted survey responses. We present the results of 32 mio. simulated survey responses across 8 Survey Response Generation Methods, 4 political attitude surveys, and 10 open-weight language models. We find significant differences between the Survey Response Generation Methods in both individual-level and subpopulation-level alignment. Our results show that Restricted Generation Methods perform best overall, and that reasoning output does not consistently improve alignment. Our work underlines the significant impact that Survey Response Generation Methods have on simulated survey responses, and we develop practical recommendations on the application of Survey Response Generation Methods.
KV cache compression promises increased throughput and efficiency with negligible loss in performance. While the gains in throughput are indisputable and recent literature has indeed shown minimal degradation on particular benchmarks, in general the consequences of compression in realistic scenarios such as multi-instruction prompting have been insufficiently studied. In this paper, we identify several pitfalls that practitioners should be aware of when deploying KV cache compressed LLMs. We evaluate five KV cache compression methods (StreamingLLM, SnapKV, TOVA, H2O, and K-Norm) on Llama3.1 8B and Qwen2.5 14B under multi-instruction prompting with IFEval. Importantly, we show that certain instructions degrade much more rapidly with compression, effectively causing them to be completely ignored by the LLM. As a practical example, we highlight system prompt leakage as a case study, empirically demonstrating the impact of compression on leakage and general instruction-following. We identify several factors that contribute to system prompt leakage: compression method, instruction order, and KV eviction bias. We then propose simple changes to KV cache eviction policies that can reduce the impact of these factors and improve the overall performance in multi-instruction tasks.
We design CIS-BWE, a novel adversarial Bandwidth Extension (BWE) framework that introduces two chaos-informed discriminators - Multi-Resolution Lyapunov Discriminator (MRLD) and Multi-Scale Detrended Fractal Analysis Discriminator (MSDFA) - for capturing the deterministic chaos from speech. MRLD exploits Lyapunov exponents to capture nonlinear chaotic fluctuations. MSDFA exploits detrended fluctuation analysis to quantify fractal-like, long-range temporal chaotic correlations. To the best of our knowledge, MRLD and MSDFA are included here for the first time with a complex-valued adversarial network to explore the chaotic study of speech reconstruction. We also introduce a novel complex-valued and dual-stream generator, which uses our newly proposed ConformerNeXt as a core block with Lattice interactions, acting as a gating mechanism by enabling controlled mixing of information across streams. We extensively optimize our design across five resolutions and use depth-wise separable convolutions to make our model lightweight yet powerful. Our CIS-BWE is tested with a de facto English and French dataset for clean and noisy speech for generalization. It achieves better performance across a total of nine subjective and objective evaluation metrics with a 40x reduction in discriminator size and overall 0.5x fewer parameters, establishing a new baseline in the BWE task.
Generative Reward Models (GenRMs) and LLM-as-a-Judge exhibit deceptive alignment by producing correct judgments for incorrect reasons, as they are trained and evaluated to prioritize Outcome Accuracy, which undermines their ability to generalize during RLHF. We introduce Rationale Consistency, a fine-grained metric that quantifies the alignment between the model’s reasoning process and human judgment. Our evaluation of frontier models reveals that rationale consistency effectively discriminates among state-of-the-art models and detects deceptive alignment, while outcome accuracy falls short in both respects. To mitigate this gap, we introduce a hybrid signal that combines rationale consistency with outcome accuracy for GenRM training. Our training method achieves state-of-the-art performance on RM-Bench (87.1%) and JudgeBench (82%), surpassing outcome-only baselines by an average of 5%. Using RM during RLHF, our method effectively improves performance as demonstrated on Arena Hard v2, notably yielding a 7% improvement in creative writing tasks. Further analysis confirms that our method escapes the deceptive alignment trap, effectively reversing the decline in rationale consistency observed in outcome-only training.
Transformer-based embedding models suffer from quadratic computational and linear memory complexity, limiting their utility for long sequences. We propose recurrent architectures as an efficient alternative, introducing a vertically chunked inference strategy that enables fast embedding generation with memory usage that becomes constant in the input length once it exceeds the vertical chunk size. By fine-tuning Mamba2 models, we demonstrate their viability as general-purpose text embedders, achieving competitive performance across a range of benchmarks while maintaining a substantially smaller memory footprint compared to transformer-based counterparts. We empirically validate the applicability of our inference strategy to Mamba2, RWKV, and xLSTM models, confirming consistent runtime-memory trade-offs across architectures and establishing recurrent models as a compelling alternative to transformers for efficient embedding generation.
Paramanu: Compact and Competitive Monolingual Language Models for Low-Resource Morphologically Rich Indian Languages
PDF ↗Multilingual large language models (LLMs) are expensive to pretrain and often suffer from imbalances across languages and datasets, English-centric bias, tokenizer oversegmentation for morphologically rich low-resource languages, and the curse of multilinguality. We introduce PARAMANU, a family of Indian language-only autoregressive language models trained from scratch on open-source language-specific data for the five most spoken Indian languages: Bangla (Bengali), Hindi, Marathi, Tamil, and Telugu. All models are designed for affordability and are trained on a single GPU with a budget under 1,000, allowing under-resourced researchers to build competitive language models. To address low-resource challenges, we develop morphology-aligned, low-fertility tokenizers, and propose an interpolation-based method for token position indices in RoPE based scaling to train longer sequences efficiently. We also create instruction-tuning datasets in Bangla that are then translated to the other four languages. Despite their small size (108M-367M parameters), Paramanu achieves a strong performance-efficiency tradeoff and outperforms most larger multilingual models up to 8B across all five languages. The models and datasets are available at: https://huggingface.co/collections/mitodru/paramanu.
From \log \pi to \pi: Taming Divergence in Soft Clipping via Bilateral Decoupled Decay of Probability Gradient Weight
PDF ↗Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has catalyzed a leap in Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, yet its optimization dynamics remain fragile. Standard algorithms like GRPO enforce stability via "hard clipping", which inadvertently stifles exploration by discarding gradients of tokens outside the trust region. While recent "soft clipping" methods attempt to recover these gradients, they suffer from a critical challenge: relying on log-probability gradient (\nabla_\theta\log \pi_\theta) yields divergent weights as probabilities vanish, destabilizing LLM training. We rethink this convention by establishing probability gradient (\nabla_\theta \pi_\theta) as the superior optimization primitive. Accordingly, we propose Decoupled Gradient Policy Optimization (DGPO), which employs a decoupled decay mechanism based on importance sampling ratios. By applying asymmetric, continuous decay to boundary tokens, DGPO resolves the conflict between stability and sustained exploration. Extensive experiments across DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen series models (1.5B/7B/14B) demonstrate that DGPO consistently outperforms strong baselines on various mathematical benchmarks, offering a robust and scalable solution for RLVR. Our code and implementation are available at: https://github.com/FlyTune/DGPO-RL.
With the widespread use of multi-modal Large Language models (MLLMs), safety issues have become a growing concern. Multi-turn dialogues, which are more common in everyday interactions, pose a greater risk than single prompts; however, existing benchmarks do not adequately consider this situation. To encourage the community to focus on the safety issues of these models in multi-turn dialogues, we introduce SafeMT, a benchmark that features dialogues of varying lengths generated from harmful queries accompanied by images. This benchmark consists of 10,000 samples in total, encompassing 17 different scenarios and four jailbreak methods. Additionally, we propose Safety Index (SI) to evaluate the general safety of MLLMs during conversations. We assess the safety of 17 models using this benchmark and discover that the risk of successful attacks on these models increases as the number of turns in harmful dialogues rises. This observation indicates that the safety mechanisms of these models are inadequate for recognizing the hazard in dialogue interactions. We propose a dialogue safety moderator capable of detecting malicious intent concealed within conversations and providing MLLMs with relevant safety policies. Experimental results from several open-source models indicate that this moderator is more effective in reducing multi-turn Attack Success Rate (ASR) compared to existed guard models.
Standard surprisal is typically computed from the linear text prefix, but human reading is non-linear and memory constrained: readers skip words, regress, and do not retain prior context perfectly. We propose a formulation of surprisal conditioned on a reader-specific accessible information state given by the scanpath history and memory dynamics, rather than by the written prefix alone. Prior context is treated as only probabilistically accessible at each fixation, allowing predictability to depend on both non-linear exposure and forgetting. We evaluate the approach on eye-tracking corpora using held-out log-likelihood over standard duration based reading measures. Across model variants, conditioning on accessible information states improves predictive fit over standard surprisal baselines. These results suggest that predictability in human reading is better characterized relative to the reader’s evolving accessible information state than to the written prefix alone.
MASPO: Unifying Gradient Utilization, Probability Mass, and Signal Reliability for Robust and Sample-Efficient LLM Reasoning
PDF ↗Existing Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) algorithms, such as GRPO, rely on rigid, uniform, and symmetric trust region mechanisms that are fundamentally misaligned with the complex optimization dynamics of Large Language Models (LLMs). In this paper, we identify three critical challenges in these methods: (1) inefficient gradient utilization caused by the binary cutoff of hard clipping, (2) insensitive probability mass arising from uniform ratio constraints that ignore the token distribution, and (3) asymmetric signal reliability stemming from the disparate credit assignment ambiguity between positive and negative samples. To bridge these gaps, we propose Mass-Adaptive Soft Policy Optimization (MASPO), a unified framework designed to harmonize these three dimensions. MASPO integrates a differentiable soft Gaussian gating to maximize gradient utility, a mass-adaptive limiter to balance exploration across the probability spectrum, and an asymmetric risk controller to align update magnitudes with signal confidence. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that MASPO serves as a robust, all-in-one RLVR solution, significantly outperforming baselines. Our code is available at: https://github.com/FlyTune/MASPO-RL.
Recent large language models support inputs of up to 10 million tokens, yet they perform poorly on long-context tasks that require complex reasoning. Such tasks can be solved using only a subset of the input — a proxy context — rather than the full sequence. Despite sharing the same underlying reasoning process, models exhibit a significant performance disparity between proxy and full contexts. To improve long-context reasoning, we propose ProxyCoT, a novel training framework that transfers reasoning capabilities from short proxy contexts to full long contexts. Specifically, we first obtain high-quality chain-of-thought reasoning traces on proxy contexts through reinforcement learning or distillation from a larger teacher model, and then ground the generated traces in full long contexts with supervised fine-tuning. Experiments across different datasets demonstrate that ProxyCoT consistently outperforms strong baselines with reduced computational overhead. Furthermore, models trained with ProxyCoT generalize their long-context reasoning capabilities to out-of-domain tasks.
Machine-translated benchmarks are widely used to assess the multilingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet translation errors in these benchmarks remain underexplored, raising concerns about the reliability and comparability of multilingual evaluation. We address two practical gaps: (i) how well automatic MQM-style error spans from LLM judges and a span-aware QE baseline (xCOMET-XXL) match expert human span annotations on benchmark translations, and (ii) how strongly translation errors (as opposed to source-side issues in the English original) explain accuracy drops on translated benchmarks. We find that span agreement is non-trivial on naturally occurring benchmark translations, and that target-side translation errors are consistently associated with measurable, percentage-point drops in translated accuracy even after controlling for English correctness and source-side anomalies.
Can generative agents be trusted in multimodal environments? Despite recent advances, agents remain limited in their ability to reason about safety, coherence, and trust across modalities. We introduce a reproducible simulation framework to evaluate generative agents in three aspects: (1) safety improvement over time via iterative plan revision in multimodal scenarios; (2) detection of unsafe activities across social contexts; and (3) social dynamics, measured through interaction and acceptance rates. These multimodal agents are evaluated using metrics that quantify plan revisions and unsafe-to-safe conversions. Experiments show that while agents detect direct multimodal contradictions, they often fail to align local revisions with global safety, achieving only a 55% success rate in correcting unsafe plans. We release a dataset of 1,000 multimodal plans, yielding more than 600,000 simulation steps. Notably, 45% of unsafe actions are accepted when paired with misleading visual cues, revealing a strong tendency to overtrust visual content. Code is available at https://github.com/AdonaiVera/X-CASE
We present an approach to modeling annotator disagreement in subjective NLP tasks through both architectural and data-centric innovations. Our model, DEM-MoE (Demographic-Aware Mixture of Experts), routes inputs to expert subnetworks based on annotator demographics, enabling it to better represent structured, group-level variation compared to prior models. DEM-MoE consistently performs competitively across demographic groups, and shows especially strong results on datasets with high annotator disagreement. To address sparse demographic coverage, we test whether LLM-generated synthetic annotations via zero-shot persona prompting can be used for data imputation. We show these synthetic judgments align moderately well with human annotations on our data and offer a scalable way to potentially enrich training data. We then propose and evaluate approaches for blending real and synthetic data using strategies tailored to dataset structure. We find that the optimal strategies depend on dataset structure. Together, these contributions improve the representation of diverse perspectives.