We investigate how large language models (LLMs) can produce personalized dialogue responses, specifically focusing on whether they reflect linguistic styles pertaining to different generations: Baby Boomers, Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Z. We create P-MultiWoZ, a personalized, generation-specific version of MultiWOZ 2.2, by prompting LLMs, and validate its alignment with the original dataset through automatic and human evaluations. To validate the appropriateness of generational linguistic traits, we introduce GeMoSC, a corpus of generation-annotated movie dialogues. Linguistic analysis and perplexity test suggest that P-MultiWoZ reflects patterns consistent with GeMoSC. Finally, a human evaluation reveals that annotators were able to mostly correctly identify the generation behind P-MultiWoZ dialogues, based only on a single query-reply pair.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 7,591 篇学术成果中精准定位
Outline generation aims to uncover the internal content structure of a document by identifying potential chapter connections and generating corresponding summaries. A robust outline generation model strives for coherence between and within plots. However, existing methods perform well on short- and medium-length texts and struggle with generating readable outlines for very long texts (e.g., fictional literary works). The primary challenge lies in their inability to accurately segment plots within long texts. To address this issue, we propose a novel unsupervised guidance framework, LeStrTP, to guide large language model (LLM) outline generation. This framework ensures that each structured plot encapsulates complete causality by accurately identifying plot boundaries. Specifically, the LeStrTP framework constructs chapter-level graph from long texts and learns their embeddings. Subsequently, through Markov chain modeling chapter dependence, a unique search operator is designed to achieve plot segmentation. To facilitate research on this task, we introduce a new annotated benchmark dataset, NovOutlineSet. Experimental results demonstrate that structured plots not only enhance the coherence and integrity of generated outlines but also significantly improve their quality.
With the help of in-context learning (ICL), large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various tasks. However, the function of descriptive instructions during ICL remains under-explored. In this work, we propose an ensemble prompt framework to describe the selection criteria of multiple in-context examples, and preliminary experiments on machine translation (MT) across six translation directions confirm that this framework boosts ICL performance. But to our surprise, LLMs might not care what the descriptions actually say, and the performance gain is primarily caused by the ensemble format, since it could lead to improvement even with random descriptive nouns. We further apply this new ensemble framework on a range of commonsense, math, logical reasoning and hallucination tasks with three LLMs and achieve promising results, suggesting again that designing a proper prompt format would be much more effective and efficient than paying effort into specific descriptions.
Large language models (LLMs) acquire general linguistic knowledge from massive-scale pretraining. However, pretraining data mainly comprised of web-crawled texts contain undesirable social biases which can be perpetuated or even amplified by LLMs. In this study, we propose an efficient yet effective annotation pipeline to investigate social biases in the pretraining corpora. Our pipeline consists of protected attribute detection to identify diverse demographics, followed by regard classification to analyze the language polarity towards each attribute. Through our experiments, we demonstrate the effect of our bias analysis and mitigation measures, focusing on Common Crawl as the most representative pretraining corpus.
In decision making, generating alternative solutions is crucial for solving a problem. However, cognitive biases can impede this process by constraining individual decision makers’ creativity. To address this issue, we introduce a new task for automatically generating alternatives, inspired by the process of human “brainstorming”. We define alternative options based on atomic action components and present a dataset of 106 annotated Reddit r/Advice posts containing unique alternative options extracted from users’ replies. We also introduce new metrics to assess the quality of generated components, including distinctiveness, creativity, upvote-weighted, crowd intersection, and final commit intersection scores. As a baseline, we evaluated the large language models (LLMs) LLaMa3:8b, LLaMa3.1:8b, and Gemma 2:9b on the alternative component generation task. On the one hand, models demonstrated high creativity (ability to generate options beyond what Reddit users suggested) and performed well at proposing distinct alternatives. A subset of generated components was manually evaluated and found overall useful. This indicates that LLMs might be used to extend lists of alternative options, helping decision makers consider a problem from different perspectives. On the other hand, LLMs’ outputs often failed to align with human suggestions, implying that they still tend to miss important components.
A Head to Predict and a Head to Question: Pre-trained Uncertainty Quantification Heads for Hallucination Detection in LLM Outputs
PDF ↗LLMs have the tendency to hallucinate, i.e., to sporadically generate false or fabricated information, and users generally lack the tools to detect when this happens. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) provides a framework for assessing the reliability of model outputs, aiding in the identification of potential hallucinations. In this work, we introduce pre-trained UQ heads: supervised auxiliary modules for LLMs that substantially enhance their ability to capture uncertainty compared to unsupervised UQ methods. Their strong performance stems from the transformer architecture in their design, in the form of informative features derived from LLM attention maps and logits. Our experiments show that these heads are highly robust and achieve state-of-the-art performance in claim-level hallucination detection across both in-domain and out-of-domain prompts. Moreover, these modules demonstrate strong generalization to languages they were not explicitly trained on. We pre-train a collection of UQ heads for popular LLM series, including Mistral, Llama, and Gemma. We publicly release both the code and the pre-trained heads.
Detoxifying offensive language while preserving the speaker’s original intent is a challenging yet critical goal for improving the quality of online interactions. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise in rewriting toxic content, they often default to overly polite rewrites, distorting the emotional tone and communicative intent. This problem is especially acute in Chinese, where toxicity often arises implicitly through emojis, homophones, or discourse context. We present ToxiRewriteCN, the first Chinese detoxification dataset explicitly designed to preserve sentiment polarity. The dataset comprises 1,556 carefully annotated triplets, each containing a toxic sentence, a sentiment-aligned non-toxic rewrite, and labeled toxic spans. It covers five real-world scenarios: standard expressions, emoji-induced and homophonic toxicity, as well as single-turn and multi-turn dialogues. We evaluate 17 LLMs, including commercial and open-source models with variant architectures, across four dimensions: detoxification accuracy, fluency, content preservation, and sentiment polarity. Results show that while commercial and MoE models perform best overall, all models struggle to balance safety with emotional fidelity in more subtle or context-heavy settings such as emoji, homophone, and dialogue-based inputs. We release ToxiRewriteCN to support future research on controllable, sentiment-aware detoxification for Chinese.
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has emerged as a promising approach for detecting hallucinations and low-quality output of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, obtaining proper uncertainty scores is complicated by the conditional dependency between the generation steps of an autoregressive LLM, because it is hard to model it explicitly. Here, we propose to learn this dependency from attention-based features. In particular, we train a regression model that leverages LLM attention maps, probabilities on the current generation step, and recurrently computed uncertainty scores from previously generated tokens. To incorporate the recurrent features, we also suggest a two-staged training procedure. Our experimental evaluation on ten datasets and three LLMs shows that the proposed method is highly effective for selective generation, achieving substantial improvements over rivaling unsupervised and supervised approaches.
Seeing Through Words, Speaking Through Pixels: Deep Representational Alignment Between Vision and Language Models
PDF ↗Recent studies show that deep vision-only and language-only models—trained on disjoint modalities—nonetheless project their inputs into a partially aligned representational space. Yet we still lack a clear picture of _where_ in each network this convergence emerges, _what_ visual or linguistic cues support it, _whether_ it captures human preferences in many-to-many image-text scenarios, and _how_ aggregating exemplars of the same concept affects alignment. Here, we systematically investigate these questions. We find that alignment peaks in mid-to-late layers of both model types, reflecting a shift from modality-specific to conceptually shared representations. This alignment is robust to appearance-only changes but collapses when semantics are altered (e.g., object removal or word-order scrambling), highlighting that the shared code is truly semantic. Moving beyond the one-to-one image-caption paradigm, a forced-choice “Pick-a-Pic” task shows that human preferences for image-caption matches are mirrored in the embedding spaces across all vision-language model pairs. This pattern holds bidirectionally when multiple captions correspond to a single image, demonstrating that models capture fine-grained semantic distinctions akin to human judgments. Surprisingly, averaging embeddings across exemplars amplifies alignment rather than blurring detail. Together, our results demonstrate that unimodal networks converge on a shared semantic code that aligns with human judgments and strengthens with exemplar aggregation.
Peer review underpins scientific progress, but it is increasingly strained by reviewer shortages and growing workloads. Large Language Models (LLMs) can automatically draft reviews now, but determining whether LLM-generated reviews are trustworthy requires systematic evaluation. Researchers have evaluated LLM reviews at either surface-level (e.g., BLEU and ROUGE) or content-level (e.g., specificity and factual accuracy). Yet it remains uncertain whether LLM-generated reviews attend to the same critical facets that human experts weigh—the strengths and weaknesses that ultimately drive an accept-or-reject decision. We introduce a focus-level evaluation framework that operationalizes the focus as a normalized distribution of attention across predefined facets in paper reviews. Based on the framework, we developed an automatic focus-level evaluation pipeline based on two sets of facets: target (e.g., problem, method, and experiment) and aspect (e.g., validity, clarity, and novelty), leveraging 676 paper reviews from OpenReview that consists of 3,657 strengths and weaknesses identified from human experts. The comparison of focus distributions between LLMs and human experts showed that the off-the-shelf LLMs consistently have a more biased focus towards examining technical validity while significantly overlooking novelty assessment when criticizing papers.Dataset: https://figshare.com/s/d5adf26c802527dd0f62
Transformer encoders are critical for a wide range of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, yet their compute–efficiency remains poorly understood. We present the first comprehensive empirical investigation of compute-optimal pretraining for encoder transformers using the Masked Language Modeling (MLM) objective. Across hundreds of carefully controlled runs we vary model size, data size, batch size, learning rate, and masking ratio, with increasing compute budget. The compute-optimal data-to-model ratio of Transformer encoder models is 10 to 100 times larger than the ratio of auto-regressive models. Using these recipes, we train OptiBERT, a family of compute-optimal BERT-style models that matches or surpasses leading baselines—including ModernBERT and NeoBERT—on GLUE and MTEB while training with dramatically less FLOPS.
Which Word Orders Facilitate Length Generalization in LMs? An Investigation with GCG-Based Artificial Languages
PDF ↗Whether language models (LMs) have inductive biases that favor typologically frequent grammatical properties over rare, implausible ones has been investigated, typically using artificial languages (ALs) (White and Cotterell, 2021; Kuribayashi et al., 2024). In this paper, we extend these works from two perspectives. First, we extend their context-free AL formalization by adopting Generalized Categorial Grammar (GCG) (Wood, 2014), which allows ALs to cover attested but previously overlooked constructions, such as unbounded dependency and mildly context-sensitive structures. Second, our evaluation focuses more on the generalization ability of LMs to process unseen longer test sentences. Thus, our ALs better capture features of natural languages and our experimental paradigm leads to clearer conclusions — typologically plausible word orders tend to be easier for LMs to productively generalize.
Topic models often fail to capture low-prevalence, domain-critical themes—so-called minority topics—such as mental health themes in online comments. While some existing methods can incorporate domain knowledge such as expected topical content, methods allowing guidance may require overly detailed expected topics, hindering the discovery of topic divisions and variation. We propose a topic modeling solution via a specially constrained NMF. We incorporate a seed word list characterizing minority content of interest, but we do not require experts to pre-specify their division across minority topics. Through prevalence constraints on minority topics and seed word content across topics, we learn distinct data-driven minority topics as well as majority topics. The constrained NMF is fitted via Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions with multiplicative updates. We outperform several baselines on synthetic data in terms of topic purity, normalized mutual information, and also evaluate topic quality using Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD). We conduct a case study on YouTube vlog comments, analyzing viewer discussion of mental health content; our model successfully identifies and reveals this domain relevant minority content.
Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly smaller variants, still struggle with complex reasoning tasks. While inference-time prompting can guide reasoning, existing methods often rely on sequential queries. Ensemble approaches offer a promising path to performance gains, especially given recent batch inference speed-ups. This work introduces DIPPER, a novel, training-free framework that transforms a single LLM into an effective inference-time ensemble. By feeding the model an optimized and diverse set of prompts in parallel, DIPPER elicits varied reasoning paths, leading to performance gains. We empirically demonstrate significant improvements on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, such as MATH, where a DIPPER ensemble of three Qwen2-MATH-1.5B instances (via parallel prompting of a single model) outperforms a larger Qwen2-MATH-7B model.
This work investigates capturing and modeling disagreement in Semantic Textual Similarity (STS), where sentence pairs are assigned ordinal similarity labels (0–5). Conventional STS systems average multiple annotator scores and focus on a single numeric estimate, overlooking label dispersion. By leveraging the disaggregated SemEval-2015 dataset (Soft-STS-15), this paper proposes and compares two disagreement-aware strategies that treat STS as an ordinal distribution prediction problem: a lightweight truncated Gaussian head for standard regression models, and a cross-encoder trained with a distance-aware objective, refined with temperature scaling. Results show improved performance in distance-based metrics, with the calibrated soft-label model proving best overall and notably more accurate on the most ambiguous pairs. This demonstrates that modeling disagreement benefits both calibration and ranking accuracy, highlighting the value of retaining and modeling full annotation distributions rather than collapsing them to a single mean label.
To enable broader deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), it is essential to identify the best-performing model under strict memory constraints. We present AMQ, Automated Mixed-Precision Weight-Only Quantization, a framework that assigns layer-wise quantization bit-widths to optimally balance model quality and memory usage. However, the combinatorial search space, with over 10^{100} possible configurations, makes conventional black-box optimization infeasible. AMQ overcomes this challenge through four key innovations: (1) **search space pruning** using prior knowledge to exclude unpromising configurations, (2) **quantization proxy** to bypass costly format conversions during search, (3) **quality predictor** to minimize evaluation overhead, and (4) **iterative search-and-update** strategy for fast and stable convergence. By integrating these components, AMQ efficiently explores the quality–efficiency landscape, reaching the Pareto frontier and yielding LLMs that are both compact and high-performing.
Growing literature explores toxicity and polarization in discourse, with comparatively less work on characterizing what makes dialogue prosocial and constructive. We explore conversational discourse and investigate a method for characterizing its quality built upon the notion of “responsivity”—whether one person’s conversational turn is responding to a preceding turn. We develop and evaluate methods for quantifying responsivity—first through semantic similarity of speaker turns, and second by leveraging state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) to identify the relation between two speaker turns. We evaluate both methods against a ground truth set of human-annotated conversations. Furthermore, selecting the better performing LLM-based approach, we characterize the nature of the response—whether it responded to that preceding turn in a substantive way or not. We view these responsivity links as a fundamental aspect of dialogue but note that conversations can exhibit significantly different responsivity structures. Accordingly, we then develop conversation-level derived metrics to address various aspects of conversational discourse. We use these derived metrics to explore other conversations and show that they support meaningful characterizations and differentiations across a diverse collection of conversations.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, including Argument Summarization (ArgSum), a key subfield of Argument Mining. This paper investigates the integration of state-of-the-art LLMs into ArgSum systems and their evaluation. In particular, we propose a novel prompt-based evaluation scheme, and validate it through a novel human benchmark dataset. Our work makes three main contributions: (i) the integration of LLMs into existing ArgSum systems, (ii) the development of two new LLM-based ArgSum systems, benchmarked against prior methods, and (iii) the introduction of an advanced LLM-based evaluation scheme. We demonstrate that the use of LLMs substantially improves both the generation and evaluation of argument summaries, achieving state-of-the-art results and advancing the field of ArgSum. We also show that among the four LLMs integrated in (i) and (ii), Qwen-3-32B, despite having the fewest parameters, performs best, even surpassing GPT-4o.
Introducing Spotlight: A Novel Approach for Generating Captivating Key Information from Documents
PDF ↗Analyzing and processing vast amounts of textual data presents significant challenges in efficiently extracting key information.In this paper, we introduce '***Spotlight***’, a novel paradigm for information extraction that produces concise, engaging narratives by highlighting the most compelling aspects of a document. Unlike highlights (fragmented key points) and traditional summaries, which prioritize comprehensive coverage, spotlights selectively emphasize intriguing content to foster deeper reader engagement with the source material. We formally differentiate spotlights from related constructs and support our analysis with a detailed benchmarking study using new datasets curated for this work. To generate high-quality spotlights, we propose a two-stage approach: fine-tuning a large language model on our benchmark data, followed by alignment via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that the resulting model not only identifies key elements with precision but also enhances readability and boosts the engagement value of the original document. Datasets and code are available at https://github.com/ankan2/Spotlight-EMNLP2025.
Language models such as GPT and Llama have shown remarkable ability on diverse natural language tasks, yet their performance on complex table tasks (e.g., NL-to-Code, data cleaning, etc.) continues to be suboptimal. To improve their performance, task-specific fine-tuning is often needed, which, however, require expensive human labeling and is prone to over-fitting.In this work, we propose Table-Specialist, a new self-trained fine-tuning paradigm specifically designed for table tasks. Our insight is that for each table task, there often exist two dual versions of the same task, one generative and one classification in nature. Leveraging their duality, we propose a Generator-Validator paradigm to iteratively generate-then-validate training data from language models, to fine-tune stronger Table-Specialist models that can specialize in a given task, without using manually-labeled data.Extensive evaluations of Table-Specialist on Llama, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 suggest that our Table-Specialist has (1) **strong performance** on diverse table tasks over vanilla language-models – for example, Table-Specialist fine-tuned on GPT-3.5 not only outperforms vanilla GPT-3.5, but can often match or surpass GPT-4 level quality, (2) **lower cost** to deploy, because when Table-Specialist fine-tuned on GPT-3.5 achieve GPT-4 level quality, it becomes possible to deploy smaller models with lower latency/cost at comparable quality, and (3) **better generalizability** when evaluated across multiple benchmarks, since Table-Specialist is fine-tuned on a broad range of training data systematically generated from diverse real tables. Our code is available at [microsoft/Table-Specialist](https://github.com/microsoft/Table-Specialist). Specialist models fine-tuned using Table-Specialist have been integrated into Microsoft Excel for use cases such as automated table data cleaning.