Imbalanced data are commonly present in real-world applications. While data synthesis can effectively mitigate data scarcity for rare classes, and LLMs have revolutionized text generation, the application of LLMs to the synthesis of relational/structured tabular data remains underexplored. Moreover, existing approaches lack an effective feedback mechanism to guide LLMs in continuously optimizing the quality of the generated data throughout the synthesis process. In this work, we propose RDDG, Relational Data generator with Dynamic Guidance, which is a unified in-context learning framework that employs progressive chain-of-thought (CoT) steps to generate tabular data for enhancing downstream imbalanced classification performance. RDDG first uses core set selection to identify representative samples from the original data, then utilizes in-context learning to discover the inherent patterns and correlations among attributes within the core set, and subsequently generates tabular data while preserving the aforementioned constraints. More importantly, it incorporates a self-reinforcing feedback mechanism that provides automatic assessments of the quality of the generated data, enabling continuous quality optimization throughout the generation process. Experimental results on multiple real and synthetic datasets demonstrate that RDDG outperforms existing approaches in both data fidelity and downstream imbalanced classification performance.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 9,460 篇学术成果中精准定位
AI, Take the Wheel: What Drives Delegation and Trust in Human–Computer Cooperative Question Answering?
PDF ↗AI systems are fallible, and humans can make mistakes in deciding whether to trustAI over their own judgment. Thus, improving human-AI collaboration requires that we understand when,why, and how humans decide to rely on AI. We study two reliance decisions: delegating a task toAI without seeing its output (whether AI is used) and evaluating AI suggestions to decidewhether to adopt them how AI output shapes final decisions).Both matter for effective collaboration, yet prior work lacks naturalistic experiments capturing both patternsfor the same users. We address this gap by studying collaborative human–AI teams competing in aquestion-answering game in which humans can choose when and how to work with AI agents to win.Our 24 matches pair 23 expert humans with 16 AI agents, capturing 387 delegation and 1440 adoption decisions.While human–AI collaboration performs better than either AI or humansalone, humans make suboptimal collaboration decisions, bothunder-relying on correct AI suggestions (3.7% of opportunities missed) and over-relying when AI misleads them (1.5%).Both parties contribute wrong answers: reported model confidence is near chance when humans and AI disagree, while confirmation bias drives higher under-reliance (60.7%) when an AI suggestion agrees with humans’ initial incorrect answer.
Speculative Decoding (SD) accelerates autoregressive large language model (LLM) inference by decoupling generation and verification. While recent methods improve draft quality by tightly coupling the drafter with the target model, the verification mechanism itself remains largely unchanged, relying on strict token-level rejection sampling. In practice, modern LLMs frequently operate in low-margin regimes where the target model exhibits weak preference among top candidates. In such cases, rejecting plausible runner-up tokens yields negligible information gain while incurring substantial rollback cost, leading to a fundamental inefficiency in verification.We propose Margin-Aware Speculative Verification, a training-free and domain-agnostic verification strategy that adapts to the target model’s local decisiveness. Our method conditions verification on decision stability measured directly from the target logits and relaxes rejection only when strict verification provides minimal benefit. Importantly, the approach modifies only the verification rule and is fully compatible with existing target-coupled speculative decoding frameworks. Extensive experiments across model scales ranging from 8B to 235B demonstrate that our method delivers consistent and significant inference speedups over state-of-the-art baselines while preserving generation quality across diverse benchmarks. The code is available at https://github.com/5SSjw/MARS.
MDocRAG-RL: Empowering Multi-Modal Document RAG via Complex Visual Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning
PDF ↗While Retrieval-Augmented Generation(RAG) enhances multi-modal large language models(MLLMs) by introducing external knowledge, existing RAG systems still face significant limitations when dealing with complex visual reasoning. On one hand, MLLMs, being generative models, produce suboptimal embeddings for retrieval tasks. On the other hand, existing methods naively insert images into context without adequate visual perception, thereby limiting reasoning capabilities. To address these challenges, we propose MDocRAG-RL, a novel RAG framework for complex visual reasoning. We design specialized pre-training and fine-tuning tasks to enable MLLMs to compress visual document representations and align textual and visual embeddings for improved retrieval efficiency. Additionally, we design a visual perception action space for the generator that allows progressive coarse-to-fine information acquisition from visually-rich documents. Furthermore, we develop a reinforcement learning framework to enhance the complex visual reasoning capability of the RAG system. Extensive experiments on multiple challenging benchmarks demonstrate the significant effectiveness of our approach, achieving state-of-the-art performance across various benchmarks.
Reward models (RMs) play a critical role in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Yet in the domain of tool learning, the lack of RMs specifically designed for function-calling tasks has limited progress toward more capable agentic AI. We introduce ToolRM, a family of lightweight reward models tailored for general tool-use scenarios. To build these models, we propose a novel pipeline that constructs high-quality pairwise preference data using rule-based scoring and multidimensional sampling. This yields ToolPref-Pairwise-30K, a diverse, balanced, and challenging preference dataset that supports both generative and discriminative reward modeling. We also introduce TRBench_{BFCL}, a benchmark built on the agent evaluation suite BFCL to evaluate RMs on tool calling tasks. Trained on our constructed data, models from the Qwen3-4B/8B series achieve up to 17.94% higher accuracy, substantially outperforming frontier LLMs and RMs in pairwise reward judgments. Beyond training objectives, generative ToolRM generalizes to broader critique tasks, including Best-of-N sampling and self-correction. Experiments on ACEBench highlight its effectiveness and efficiency, enabling inference-time scaling while reducing output token usage by over 66%. Its support for downstream RL training further validates its practical utility. We release data to facilitate future research.
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic Western-centric bias, yet whether prompting in non-Western languages (e.g., Chinese) can mitigate this remains understudied. Answering this question requires rigorous evaluation and effective mitigation, but existing approaches fall short on both fronts: evaluation methods force outputs into predefined cultural categories without a neutral option, while mitigation relies on expensive multi-cultural corpora or agent frameworks that use functional roles (e.g., Planner–Critique) lacking explicit cultural representation. To address these gaps, we introduce CEBiasBench, a Chinese–English bilingual benchmark, and Multi-Agent Vote (MAV), which enables explicit "no bias” judgments. Using this framework, we find that Chinese prompting merely shifts bias toward East Asian perspectives rather than eliminating it. To mitigate such persistent bias, we propose Multi-Agent Cultural Debate (MACD), a training-free framework that assigns agents distinct cultural personas and orchestrates deliberation via a "Seeking Common Ground while Reserving Differences” strategy. Experiments demonstrate that MACD achieves 57.6% average No Bias Rate evaluated by LLM-as-judge and 86.0% evaluated by MAV (vs. 47.6% and 69.0% baseline using GPT-4o as backbone) on CEBiasBench and generalizes to the Arabic CAMeL benchmark, confirming that explicit cultural representation in agent frameworks is essential for cross-cultural fairness.
We study the reasoning behavior of large language models (LLMs) under limited computation budgets. In such settings, producing useful partial solutions quickly is often more practical than exhaustive reasoning, which incurs high inference costs. Many real-world tasks, such as trip planning, require models to deliver the best possible output within a fixed reasoning budget. We introduce an anytime reasoning framework and the Anytime Index, a metric that quantifies how effectively solution quality improves as reasoning tokens increase. To further enhance efficiency, we propose an inference-time self-improvement method using LLM-synthesized preference data, where models learn from their own reasoning comparisons to produce better intermediate solutions. Experiments on NaturalPlan (Trip), AIME, and GPQA datasets show consistent gains across Grok-3, GPT-oss, GPT-4.1/4o, and LLaMA models, improving both reasoning quality and efficiency under budget constraints.
EmoRes: Toward Adaptive Psychological Support via User-Agnostic Benchmark and Topic-Mining Agent
PDF ↗Large language models exhibit significant potential for psychological support, yet they often generate fragmented and emotionally inconsistent dialogues that lack the therapeutic structure necessary for reliable assessment.To address these issues, we introduce **VeilEval**, a clinically grounded and privacy-preserving benchmark equipped with interpretable metrics for evaluating multi-turn psychological dialogues.Furthermore, we propose Emotion-Resonance (**EmoRes**), a multi-agent framework that boosts psychological reasoning via a Topic-Mining Emotional Agent and a multi-perspective Self-Reflection Agent, thereby jointly improving topic continuity, emotional coherence, and clinical interpretability.Experiments demonstrate that EmoRes achieves up to \sim 3\times improvement over strong baselines on VeilEval, with its effectiveness further validated by ablation studies and human evaluations.
A line of work in planning uses LLM not to generate a plan, but to generate a formal representation in some planning language, which can be input into a symbolic solver to deterministically find a plan. While showing improved trust and promising performance, dozens of recent publications have proposed scattered methods on a variety of benchmarks under different experimental settings. We attempt to unify the inference-time LLM-as-formalizer methodology for classical planning by proposing a unifying organizational framework based on intermediate representations. We thus systematically evaluate more than a dozen pipelines that subsume most existing work, while proposing novel ones that involve syntactically similar but high-resource intermediate languages (such as a Python wrapper of PDDL). We provide recipes for planning language generation pipelines, draw a series of conclusions showing the efficacy of their various components, and evidence their robustness against problem complexity.
Masking or Mitigating? Deconstructing the Impact of Query Rewriting on Retriever Biases in RAG
PDF ↗Dense retrievers in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems exhibit systematic biases—including brevity, position, literal matching, and repetition biases—that can compromise retrieval quality. Query rewriting techniques are now standard in RAG pipelines, yet their impact on these biases remains unexplored. We present the first systematic study of how query enhancement techniques affect dense retrieval biases, evaluating five methods across six retrievers. Our findings reveal that simple LLM-based rewriting achieves the strongest aggregate bias reduction (54%), yet fails under adversarial conditions where multiple biases combine. Mechanistic analysis uncovers two distinct mechanisms: simple rewriting reduces bias through increased score variance, while pseudo-document methods achieve reduction through genuine decorrelation from bias-inducing features. However, no technique uniformly addresses all biases, and effects vary substantially across retrievers. Our results provide practical guidance for selecting query enhancement strategies based on specific bias vulnerabilities. More broadly, we establish a taxonomy distinguishing query-document interaction biases from document encoding biases, clarifying the limits of query-side interventions for debiasing RAG systems.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, enabling the fast development of tools such as stress monitors, wellness trackers, and mental health chatbots. However, this rapid and low-barrier development can also introduce risks, including bias, privacy violations, and unequal access, especially when systems overlook real-world contexts, diverse user needs, and cultural settings. Many recent approaches use AI to identify such risks automatically, but this can reduce human engagement in understanding how harms arise, who they affect, and which stakeholder needs remain unspoken. We present a human-centered ethical foresight framework that generates speculative user stories and supports multi-agent discussions to help people reflect on potential benefits and harms of healthcare AI before deployment. In a user study, participants who engaged with stories identified a broader range of harms, distributing their responses more evenly across all 17 harm types, whereas those who did not engage with stories focused primarily on privacy and well-being (79.1%). Overall, our findings suggest that storytelling helps people anticipate potential risks and benefits and reflect more broadly on how AI systems may affect different users, contexts, and often unspoken needs.
Large language models are increasingly deployed in multi-turn settings such as tutoring, support, and counseling, where reliability depends on preserving consistent roles, personas, and goals across long horizons. This requirement becomes critical when LLMs are used to generate synthetic dialogues for training and evaluation, since LLM–LLM conversations can accumulate identity-related failures such as persona drift, role confusion, and “echoing”, where one agent gradually mirrors its partner. We introduce SPASM (Stable Persona-driven Agent Simulation for Multi-turn dialogue generation), a modular, stability-first framework that decomposes simulation into (i) persona creation via schema sampling, plausibility validation, and natural-language persona crafting, (ii) Client–Responder dialogue generation, and (iii) termination detection for coherent stopping. To improve long-horizon stability without changing model weights, we propose Egocentric Context Projection (ECP): dialogue history is stored in a perspective-agnostic representation and deterministically projected into each agent’s egocentric view before generation. Across three LLM backbones (GPT-4o-mini, DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen-Plus) and nine Client–Responder pairings, we construct a dataset of 4,500 personas and 45,000 conversations (500 personas × 10 conversations per pairing). Ablations show ECP substantially reduces persona drift and, under human validation, eliminates echoing; embedding analyses recover persona structure and reveal strong responder-driven interaction geometry. Our code is available at https://github.com/lhannnn/SPASM.
Mock trial has long served as an important platform for professional legal training and education. Traditional mock trials are difficult to access by the public because they rely on professional tutors and human participants. Fortunately, the rise of large language models (LLMs) provides new opportunities for creating more accessible and scalable court simulations. While promising, existing research ignored the systematic design and procedure evaluation of court simulations, which are critical to the credibility and usage of court simulation in practice. To this end, we propose a novel court simulation paradigm, i.e. SimCourt, based on the real-world procedure structure of Chinese courts, and design a comprehensive evaluation framework focusing on both legal judgment prediction and court procedure analysis. Experiments show that our framework can generate simulated trials that better guide the system in predicting the imprisonment, probation, and fine of each case. Further procedure evaluations show that agents’ responses under our simulation framework even outperform judges and lawyers from the real trials in many aspects. These demonstrate the potential of LLM-based court simulation.
What happens when a storyteller forgets its own story? Large Language Models (LLMs) can now generate narratives spanning tens of thousands of words, but they often fail to maintain consistency throughout. When generating long-form narratives, these models can contradict their own established facts, character traits, and world rules. Existing story generation benchmarks focus mainly on plot quality and fluency, leaving consistency errors largely unexplored. To address this gap, we present ConStory-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate narrative consistency in long-form story generation. It contains 2,000 prompts across four task scenarios and defines a taxonomy of five error categories with 19 fine-grained subtypes. We also develop ConStory-Checker, an automated pipeline that detects contradictions and grounds each judgment in explicit textual evidence. Evaluating a range of LLMs through five research questions, we find that consistency errors show clear tendencies: they are most common in factual and temporal dimensions, tend to appear around the middle of narratives, occur in text segments with higher token-level entropy, and certain error types tend to co-occur. These findings can inform future efforts to improve consistency in long-form narrative generation.
Visual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (VRAG) enhances Vision-Language Models (VLMs) by incorporating external visual documents to address a given query. Existing VRAG frameworks usually depend on rigid, pre-defined external tools to extend the perceptual capabilities of VLMs, typically by explicitly separating visual perception from subsequent reasoning processes. However, this decoupled design can lead to unnecessary loss of visual information, particularly when image-based operations such as cropping are applied. In this paper, we propose Lang2Act, which enables fine-grained visual perception and reasoning through self-emergent linguistic toolchains. Rather than invoking fixed external engines, Lang2Act collects self-emergent actions as linguistic tools and leverages them to enhance the visual perception capabilities of VLMs. To support this mechanism, we design a two-stage Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based training framework. Specifically, the first stage optimizes VLMs to self-explore high-quality actions for constructing a reusable linguistic toolbox, and the second stage further optimizes VLMs to exploit these linguistic tools for downstream reasoning effectively. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of Lang2Act in substantially enhancing the visual perception capabilities of VLMs, achieving performance improvements of over 4%. All code and data are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/Lang2Act.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are challenged by generating hallucinations and factually incorrect responses, particularly in complex and specialized medical question answering (QA). Integrating knowledge graphs (KGs) through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods has emerged as a promising direction. However, existing graph-based RAG methods heuristically retrieve and refine question-relevant subgraphs, potentially introducing redundant and noisy factual information that is difficult for LLMs to process, ultimately limiting reasoning capability. To incorporate a concise yet informative evidence subgraph, we propose an iterative medical QA framework. It optimizes graph-based RAG methods by selectively retrieving focused knowledge from KGs to construct a precise evidence subgraph and progressively pruning it utilizing structured feature representations. The targeted KG integration maintains coherent and reliable inference. Experiments on three medical QA benchmark datasets demonstrate that the framework achieves state-of-the-art performance against representative baseline competitors, highlighting the importance of efficient KG integration.
Large language models (LLMs) are expected to be trained to act as agents in various real-world environments, but this process relies on rich and varied tool-interaction sandboxes. However, access to real systems is often restricted; LLM-simulated environments are prone to hallucinations and inconsistencies; and manually built sandboxes are hard to scale. In this paper, we propose EnvScaler, an automated framework for scalable tool-interaction environments via programmatic synthesis. EnvScaler comprises two components. First, SkelBuilder constructs diverse environment skeletons through topic mining, logic modeling, and quality evaluation. Then, ScenGenerator generates multiple task scenarios and rule-based trajectory validation functions for each environment. With EnvScaler, we synthesize 191 environments and about 7K scenarios, and apply them to Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for Qwen3 series models. Results on three benchmarks show that EnvScaler significantly improves LLMs’ ability to solve tasks in complex environments involving multi-turn, multi-tool interactions.
Hate, derogatory, and offensive speech remains a persistent challenge in online platforms and public discourse. While automated detection systems are widely used, most focus on censorship or removal, raising concerns for transparency and freedom of expression, and limiting opportunities to explain why content is harmful. To address these issues, explanatory approaches have emerged as a promising solution, aiming to make hate speech detection more transparent, accountable, and informative. In this paper, we present a hybrid approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with three newly created and curated vocabularies to detect and explain hate speech in English, French, and Greek. Our system captures both inherently derogatory expressions tied to identity characteristics and direct group-targeted content through two complementary pipelines: one that detects and disambiguates problematic terms using the curated vocabularies, and one that leverages LLMs as context-aware evaluators of group-targeting content. The outputs are fused into grounded explanations that clarify why content is flagged. Human evaluation shows that our hybrid approach is accurate, with high-quality explanations, outperforming LLM-only baselines.
Training large language models for domain adaptation poses a significant challenge in balancing the acquisition of domain knowledge with the retention of general abilities, often leading to catastrophic forgetting. While curriculum learning offers a promising direction, conventional methods typically rely on a single dimension of knowledge or task, which is insufficient to navigate the trade-off between knowledge breadth and task depth. In this paper, we propose a two-dimensional curriculum learning framework that coordinates model training along two orthogonal axes: the knowledge dimension and the task dimension. We first reconstruct the dataset by clustering instances according to their semantic similarity to general-domain data, and subsequently annotate them with a task hierarchy. Then, we design an integrated curriculum that develops from general to domain-specific knowledge clusters, and within each cluster, from lower- to higher-order cognitive tasks. Compared with the second-best method, our method improves accuracy on medical evaluations by 2.49% and on financial evaluations by 1.2%. Ablation and cross-domain experiments further demonstrate our method as a scalable and effective framework for structured domain adaptation in large language model fine-tuning. We have released the code in an anonymous repository at https://github.com/Melo-1017/Balancing-Knowledge-Breadth-and-Task-Depth.
Masked diffusion models (MDMs), which leverage bidirectional attention and a denoising process, are narrowing the performance gap with autoregressive models (ARMs). However, their internal attention mechanisms remain under-explored. This paper investigates the attention behaviors in MDMs, revealing the phenomenon of Attention Floating. Unlike ARMs, where attention converges to a fixed sink, MDMs exhibit dynamic, dispersed attention anchors that shift across denoising steps and layers. Further analysis reveals its Shallow Structure-Aware, Deep Content-Focused attention mechanism: shallow layers utilize floating tokens to build a global structural framework, while deeper layers allocate more capability toward capturing semantic content. Empirically, this distinctive attention pattern provides a mechanistic explanation for the strong in-context learning capabilities of MDMs, allowing them to double the performance compared to ARMs in knowledge-intensive tasks. All codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/Attention-Floating.