论文检索

Social Aspects · Fairness

Yuefan Cao, Xiaoyu Li, Yingyu Liang, Zhizhou Sha, Zhenmei Shi, Zhao Song, Jiahao Zhang

As AI research surges in both impact and volume, conferences have imposed submission limits to maintain paper quality and alleviate organizational pressure. In this work, we examine the fairness of desk-rejection systems under submission limits and reveal that existing practices can result in substantial inequities. Specifically, we formally define the paper submission limit problem and identify a critical dilemma: when the number of authors exceeds three, it becomes impossible to reject papers solely based on excessive submissions without negatively impacting innocent authors. Thus, this issue may unfairly affect early-career researchers, as their submissions may be penalized due to co-authors with significantly higher submission counts, while senior researchers with numerous papers face minimal consequences. To address this, we propose an optimization-based fairness-aware desk-rejection mechanism and formally define two fairness metrics: worst-case fairness and average fairness. We prove that optimizing worst-case fairness is NP-hard, whereas average fairness can be efficiently optimized via linear programming. Through case studies, we demonstrate that our proposed system ensures greater equity than existing methods, including those used in CVPR 2025, offering a more socially just approach to managing excessive submissions in AI conferences.

Social Aspects · Everything Else

Angéline Pouget, Mohammad Yaghini, Stephan Rabanser, Nicolas Papernot

Deploying machine learning models in safety-critical domains poses a key challenge: ensuring reliable model performance on downstream user data without access to ground truth labels for direct validation. We propose the _suitability filter_, a novel framework designed to detect performance deterioration by utilizing _suitability signals_—model output features that are sensitive to covariate shifts and indicative of potential prediction errors. The suitability filter evaluates whether classifier accuracy on unlabeled user data shows significant degradation compared to the accuracy measured on the labeled test dataset. Specifically, it ensures that this degradation does not exceed a pre-specified margin, which represents the maximum acceptable drop in accuracy. To achieve reliable performance evaluation, we aggregate suitability signals for both test and user data and compare these empirical distributions using statistical hypothesis testing, thus providing insights into decision uncertainty. Our modular method adapts to various models and domains. Empirical evaluations across different classification tasks demonstrate that the suitability filter reliably detects performance deviations due to covariate shift. This enables proactive mitigation of potential failures in high-stakes applications.

Social Aspects · Fairness

Firas Laakom, Haobo Chen, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Yuheng Bu

Despite substantial progress in promoting fairness in high-stake applications using machine learning models, existing methods often modify the training process, such as through regularizers or other interventions, but lack formal guarantees that fairness achieved during training will generalize to unseen data. Although overfitting with respect to prediction performance has been extensively studied, overfitting in terms of fairness loss has received far less attention. This paper proposes a theoretical framework for analyzing fairness generalization error through an information-theoretic lens. Our novel bounding technique is based on Efron–Stein inequality, which allows us to derive tight information-theoretic fairness generalization bounds with both Mutual Information (MI) and Conditional Mutual Information (CMI). Our empirical results validate the tightness and practical relevance of these bounds across diverse fairness-aware learning algorithms.Our framework offers valuable insights to guide the design of algorithms improving fairness generalization.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Bilal Chughtai, Stefan Heimersheim, Marius Hobbhahn

AI models might use deceptive strategies as part of scheming or misaligned behaviour. Monitoring outputs alone is insufficient, since the AI might produce seemingly benign outputs while its internal reasoning is misaligned. We thus evaluate if linear probes can robustly detect deception by monitoring model activations. We test two probe-training datasets, one with contrasting instructions to be honest or deceptive (following Zou et al. (2023)) and one of responses to simple roleplaying scenarios. We test whether these probes generalize to realistic settings where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct behaves deceptively, such as concealing insider trading Scheurer et al. (2023) and purposely underperforming on safety evaluations Benton et al. (2024). We find that our probe distinguishes honest and deceptive responses with AUROCs between 0.96 and 0.999 on our evaluation datasets. If we set the decision threshold to have a 1\% false positive rate on chat data not related to deception, our probe catches 95-99\% of the deceptive responses. Overall we think white-box probes are promising for future monitoring systems, but current performance is insufficient as a robust defence against deception. Our probes' outputs can be viewed at https://data.apolloresearch.ai/dd/ and our code at https://github.com/ApolloResearch/deception-detection.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Aaron Mueller, Atticus Geiger, Sarah Wiegreffe, Dana Arad, Iván Arcuschin, Adam Belfki, Yik Siu Chan, Jaden Fiotto-Kaufman, Tal Haklay, Michael Hanna 等

How can we know whether new mechanistic interpretability methods achieve real improvements?In pursuit of lasting evaluation standards, we propose MIB, a Mechanistic Interpretability Benchmark, with two tracks spanning four tasks and five models. MIB favors methods that precisely and concisely recover relevant causal pathways or causal variables in neural language models. The circuit localization track compares methods that locate the model components---and connections between them---most important for performing a task (e.g., attribution patching or information flow routes). The causal variable track compares methods that featurize a hidden vector, e.g., sparse autoencoders (SAE) or distributed alignment search (DAS), and align those features to a task-relevant causal variable. Using MIB, we find that attribution and mask optimization methods perform best on circuit localization. For causal variable localization, we find that the supervised DAS method performs best, while SAEs features are not better than neurons, i.e., non-featurized hidden vectors. These findings illustrate that MIB enables meaningful comparisons, and increases our confidence that there has been real progress in the field.

Social Aspects · Fairness

Beepul Bharti, Mary Clemens-Sewall, Paul H. Yi, Jeremias Sulam

As the use of predictive machine learning algorithms increases in high-stakes decision-making, it is imperative that these algorithms are fair across sensitive groups. However, measuring and enforcing fairness in real-world applications can be challenging due to missing or incomplete sensitive group information. Proxy-sensitive attributes have been proposed as a practical and effective solution in these settings, but only for parity-based fairness notions. Knowing how to evaluate and control for fairness with missing sensitive group data for newer, different, and more flexible frameworks, such as multiaccuracy and multicalibration, remains unexplored. In this work, we address this gap by demonstrating that in the absence of sensitive group data, proxy-sensitive attributes can provably be used to derive actionable upper bounds on the true multiaccuracy and multicalibration violations, providing insights into a predictive model’s potential worst-case fairness violations. Additionally, we show that adjusting models to satisfy multiaccuracy and multicalibration across proxy-sensitive attributes can significantly mitigate these violations for the true, but unknown, sensitive groups. Through several experiments on real-world datasets, we illustrate that approximate multiaccuracy and multicalibration can be achieved even when sensitive group data is incomplete or unavailable.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Justin S. Kang, Landon Butler, Abhineet Agarwal, Yigit Efe Erginbas, Ramtin Pedarsani, Bin Yu, Kannan Ramchandran

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized machine learning due to their ability to capture complex interactions between input features. Popular post-hoc explanation methods like SHAP provide *marginal* feature attributions, while their extensions to interaction importances only scale to small input lengths ($\approx 20$). We propose *Spectral Explainer* (SPEX), a model-agnostic interaction attribution algorithm that efficiently scales to large input lengths ($\approx 1000)$. SPEX exploits underlying natural sparsity among interactions—common in real-world data—and applies a sparse Fourier transform using a channel decoding algorithm to efficiently identify important interactions. We perform experiments across three difficult long-context datasets that require LLMs to utilize interactions between inputs to complete the task. For large inputs, SPEX outperforms marginal attribution methods by up to 20\% in terms of faithfully reconstructing LLM outputs. Further, SPEX successfully identifies key features and interactions that strongly influence model output. For one of our datasets, *HotpotQA*, SPEX provides interactions that align with human annotations. Finally, we use our model-agnostic approach to generate explanations to demonstrate abstract reasoning in closed-source LLMs (*GPT-4o mini*) and compositional reasoning in vision-language models.

Social Aspects · Safety

Kristina Nikolić, Luze Sun, Jie Zhang, Florian Tramer

Jailbreak attacks bypass the guardrails of large language models to produce harmful outputs.In this paper, we ask whether the model outputs produced by existing jailbreaks are actually *useful*. For example, when jailbreaking a model to give instructions for building a bomb, does the jailbreak yield good instructions?Since the utility of most unsafe answers (e.g., bomb instructions) is hard to evaluate rigorously, we build new jailbreak evaluation sets with known ground truth answers, by aligning models to refuse questions related to benign and easy-to-evaluate topics (e.g., biology or math).Our evaluation of eight representative jailbreaks across five utility benchmarks reveals a consistent drop in model utility in jailbroken responses, which we term the *jailbreak tax*. For example, while all jailbreaks we tested bypass guardrails in models aligned to refuse to answer math, this comes at the expense of a drop of up to 92% in accuracy.Overall, our work proposes jailbreak utility as a new important metric in AI safety, and introduces benchmarks to evaluate existing and future jailbreaks. We make the benchmark available at https://github.com/ethz-spylab/jailbreak-tax

Social Aspects · Privacy

Wa-Kin Lei, Jun-Cheng Chen, Shang-Tse Chen

With the rise of large foundation models, split inference (SI) has emerged as a popular computational paradigm for deploying models across lightweight edge devices and cloud servers, addressing data privacy and computational cost concerns. However, most existing data reconstruction attacks have focused on smaller CNN classification models, leaving the privacy risks of foundation models in SI settings largely unexplored. To address this gap, we propose a novel data reconstruction attack based on guided diffusion, which leverages the rich prior knowledge embedded in a latent diffusion model (LDM) pre-trained on a large-scale dataset. Our method performs iterative reconstruction on the LDM’s learned image prior, effectively generating high-fidelity images resembling the original data from their intermediate representations (IR). Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, both qualitatively and quantitatively, in reconstructing data from deep-layer IRs of the vision foundation model. The results highlight the urgent need for more robust privacy protection mechanisms for large models in SI scenarios.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Jiahai Feng, Stuart Russell, Jacob Steinhardt

Pretrained language models (LMs) can generalize to implications of facts that they are finetuned on. For example, if finetuned on "John Doe lives in Tokyo," LMs correctly answer "What language do the people in John Doe's city speak?'' with "Japanese''. However, little is known about the mechanisms that enable this generalization or how they are learned during pretraining.We introduce extractive structures as a framework for describing how components in LMs (e.g., MLPs or attention heads) coordinate to enable this generalization. The structures consist of informative components that store training facts as weight changes, and upstream and downstream extractive components that query and process the stored information to produce the correct implication. We hypothesize that extractive structures are learned during pretraining when encountering implications of previously known facts. This yields two predictions: a data ordering effect where extractive structures can be learned only if facts precede their implications, and a weight grafting effect where extractive structures can be grafted to predict counterfactual implications.We empirically show these effects in the OLMo-7b, Llama 3-8b, Gemma 2-9b, and Qwen 2-7b models.Of independent interest, our results also indicate that fact learning can occur at both early and late layers, which lead to different forms of generalization.

Social Aspects · Privacy

Yuzheng Hu, Fan Wu, Ruicheng Xian, Yuhang Liu, Lydia Zakynthinou, Pritish Kamath, Chiyuan Zhang, David Forsyth

We propose the notion of empirical privacy variance and study it in the context of differentially private fine-tuning of language models. Specifically, we show that models calibrated to the same $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP guarantee using DP-SGD with different hyperparameter configurations can exhibit significant variations in empirical privacy, which we quantify through the lens of memorization. We investigate the generality of this phenomenon across multiple dimensions and discuss why it is surprising and relevant. Through regression analysis, we examine how individual and composite hyperparameters influence empirical privacy. The results reveal a no-free-lunch trade-off: existing practices of hyperparameter tuning in DP-SGD, which focus on optimizing utility under a fixed privacy budget, often come at the expense of empirical privacy. To address this, we propose refined heuristics for hyperparameter selection that explicitly account for empirical privacy, showing that they are both precise and practically useful. Finally, we take preliminary steps to understand empirical privacy variance. We propose two hypotheses, identify limitations in existing techniques like privacy auditing, and outline open questions for future research.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Shahaf Bassan, Yizhak Elboher, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff, Guy Katz

Despite significant advancements in post-hoc explainability techniques for neural networks, many current methods rely on heuristics and do not provide formally provable guarantees over the explanations provided. Recent work has shown that it is possible to obtain explanations with formal guarantees by identifying subsets of input features that are sufficient to determine that predictions remain unchangedusing neural network verification techniques.Despite the appeal of these explanations, their computation faces significant scalability challenges. In this work, we address this gap by proposing a novel abstraction-refinement technique for efficiently computing provably sufficient explanations of neural network predictions. Our method *abstracts* the original large neural network by constructing a substantially reduced network, where a sufficient explanation of the reduced network is also *provably sufficient* for the original network, hence significantly speeding up the verification process. If the explanation is insufficient on the reduced network, we iteratively *refine* the network size by gradually increasing it until convergence.Our experiments demonstrate that our approach enhances the efficiency of obtaining provably sufficient explanations for neural network predictions while additionally providing a fine-grained interpretation of the network's predictions across different abstraction levels.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Bartosz Cywiński, Kamil Deja

Diffusion models, while powerful, can inadvertently generate harmful or undesirable content, raising significant ethical and safety concerns. Recent machine unlearning approaches offer potential solutions but often lack transparency, making it difficult to understand the changes they introduce to the base model. In this work, we introduce SAeUron, a novel method leveraging features learned by sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to remove unwanted concepts in text-to-image diffusion models. First, we demonstrate that SAEs, trained in an unsupervised manner on activations from multiple denoising timesteps of the diffusion model, capture sparse and interpretable features corresponding to specific concepts. Building on this, we propose a feature selection method that enables precise interventions on model activations to block targeted content while preserving overall performance. Our evaluation shows that SAeUron outperforms existing approaches on the UnlearnCanvas benchmark for concepts and style unlearning, and effectively eliminates nudity when evaluated with I2P. Moreover, we show that with a single SAE, we can remove multiple concepts simultaneously and that in contrast to other methods, SAeUron mitigates the possibility of generating unwanted content under adversarial attack. Code and checkpoints are available at [GitHub]( https://github.com/cywinski/SAeUron).

Social Aspects · Privacy

Atefeh Gilani, Felipe Gomez, Shahab Asoodeh, Flavio Calmon, Oliver Kosut, Lalitha Sankar

We propose a unified optimization framework for designing continuous and discrete noise distributions that ensure differential privacy (DP) by minimizing Rényi DP, a variant of DP, under a cost constraint. Rényi DP has the advantage that by considering different values of the Rényi parameter $\alpha$, we can tailor our optimization for any number of compositions. To solve the optimization problem, we reduce it to a finite-dimensional convex formulation and perform preconditioned gradient descent. The resulting noise distributions are then compared to their Gaussian and Laplace counterparts. Numerical results demonstrate that our optimized distributions are consistently better, with significant improvements in $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP guarantees in the moderate composition regimes, compared to Gaussian and Laplace distributions with the same variance.

Social Aspects · Privacy

Erchi Wang, Yuqing Zhu, Yu-Xiang Wang

This paper studies the problem of differentially private empirical risk minimization (DP-ERM) for binary linear classification. We obtain an efficient $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-DP algorithm with an empirical zero-one risk bound of $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{1}{\gamma^2\varepsilon n} + \frac{|S_{\mathrm{out}}|}{\gamma n}\right)$ where $n$ is the number of data points, $S_{\mathrm{out}}$ is an arbitrary subset of data one can remove and $\gamma$ is the margin of linear separation of the remaining data points (after $S_{\mathrm{out}}$ is removed). Here, $\tilde{O}(\cdot)$ hides only logarithmic terms. In the agnostic case, we improve the existing results when the number of outliers is small. Our algorithm is highly adaptive because it does not require knowing the margin parameter $\gamma$ or outlier subset $S_{\mathrm{out}}$. We also derive a utility bound for the advanced private hyperparameter tuning algorithm.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Qingyu Yin, Chak Tou Leong, Hongbo Zhang, Minjun Zhu, Hanqi Yan, Qiang Zhang, Yulan He, Wenjie Li, Jun Wang, Yue Zhang 等

The alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences remains a key challenge. While post-training techniques like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have achieved notable success, they often experience computational inefficiencies and training instability. In this paper, we propose \textbf{F}eature-level constrained \textbf{P}reference \textbf{O}ptimization (FPO), a novel method designed to simplify the alignment process while ensuring stability. FPO leverages pre-trained Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) and introduces feature-level constraints, allowing for efficient, sparsity-enforced alignment. Our approach enjoys efficiency by using sparse features activated in a well-trained sparse autoencoder and the quality of sequential KL divergence by using the feature-level offline reference. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that FPO achieves an above 5\% absolute improvement in win rate with much lower computational cost compared to state-of-the-art baselines, making it a promising solution for efficient and controllable LLM alignments.

Social Aspects · Security

Yue Dai, Liang Liu, Xulong Tang, Youtao Zhang, Jun Yang

Temporal graph neural networks (TGNN) have achieved significant momentum in many real-world dynamic graph tasks.While most existing TGNN attack methods assume worst-case scenarios where attackers have complete knowledge of the input graph, the assumption may not always hold in real-world situations, where attackers can, at best, access information about existing nodes and edges but not future ones after the attack.However, studying adversarial attacks under these constraints is crucial, as limited future knowledge can reveal TGNN vulnerabilities overlooked in idealized settings.Nevertheless, designing effective attacks in such scenarios is challenging: the evolving graph can weaken their impact and make it hard to affect unseen nodes. To address these challenges, we introduce MemFreezing, a novel adversarial attack framework that delivers long-lasting and spreading disruptions in TGNNs without requiring post-attack knowledge of the graph. MemFreezing strategically injects fake nodes or edges to push node memories into a stable “frozen state,” reducing their responsiveness to subsequent graph changes and limiting their ability to convey meaningful information. As the graph evolves, these affected nodes maintain and propagate their frozen state through their neighbors. Experimental results show that MemFreezing persistently degrades TGNN performance across various tasks, offering a more enduring adversarial strategy under limited future knowledge.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Gabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Zohreh Shams, Mateja Jamnik

In this paper, we investigate how concept-based models (CMs) respond to out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. CMs are interpretable neural architectures that first predict a set of high-level *concepts* (e.g., "stripes", "black") and then predict a task label from those concepts. In particular, we study the impact of *concept interventions* (i.e., operations where a human expert corrects a CM’s mispredicted concepts at test time) on CMs' task predictions when inputs are OOD. Our analysis reveals a weakness in current state-of-the-art CMs, which we term *leakage poisoning*, that prevents them from properly improving their accuracy when intervened on for OOD inputs. To address this, we introduce *MixCEM*, a new CM that learns to dynamically exploit leaked information missing from its concepts only when this information is in-distribution. Our results across tasks with and without complete sets of concept annotations demonstrate that MixCEMs outperform strong baselines by significantly improving their accuracy for both in-distribution and OOD samples in the presence and absence of concept interventions.

Social Aspects · Safety

Nikolaus Howe, Ian McKenzie, Oskar Hollinsworth, Michał Zając, Tom Tseng, Aaron Tucker, Pierre-Luc Bacon, Adam Gleave

Increasing model size has unlocked a dazzling array of capabilities in language models.At the same time, even frontier models remain vulnerable to jailbreaks and prompt injections, despite concerted efforts to make them robust.As both attackers and defenders gain access to more compute, and as models become larger, what will be the effect on robustness?We argue that to answer this question requires a *scaling lens*, which we adopt in an extensive study of language model robustness across several classification tasks, model families, and adversarial attacks.We find that in the absence of explicit safety training, larger models are not consistently more robust; however, scale improves sample efficiency in adversarial training, though it worsens compute efficiency.Further, we find that increasing attack compute smoothly improves attack success rate against both undefended and adversarially trained models.Finally, after exploring robustness transfer across attacks and threat models, we combine attack and defense scaling rates to study the offense-defense balance.We find that while attack scaling outpaces adversarial training across all models studied, larger adversarially trained models might give defense the advantage in the long run.These results underscore the utility of the scaling lens, and provide a paradigm for evaluating future attacks and defenses on frontier models.Code for this project is available at https://github.com/AlignmentResearch/scaling-llm-robustness-paper.

Social Aspects · Privacy

Justin Chen, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Alessandro Epasto, Morteza Zadimoghaddam

In the differentially private partition selection problem (a.k.a. set union, key discovery), users hold subsets of items from an unbounded universe. The goal is to output as many items as possible from the union of the users' sets while maintaining user-level differential privacy. Solutions to this problem are a core building block for many privacy-preserving ML applications including vocabulary extraction in a private corpus, computing statistics over categorical data and learning embeddings over user-provided items. We propose an algorithm for this problem, MaxAdaptiveDegree (MAD), which adaptively reroutes weight from items with weight far above the threshold needed for privacy to items with smaller weight, thereby increasing the probability that less frequent items are output. Our algorithm can be efficiently implemented in massively parallel computation systems allowing scalability to very large datasets. We prove that our algorithm stochastically dominates the standard parallel algorithm for this problem. We also develop a two-round version of our algorithm, MAD2R, where results of the computation in the first round are used to bias the weighting in the second round to maximize the number of items output. In experiments, our algorithms provide the best results among parallel algorithms and scale to datasets with hundreds of billions of items, up to three orders of magnitude larger than those analyzed in prior works.