Self-intersections are widespread in surface meshes and invalidate downstream simulation, fabrication, and learning pipelines. Existing approaches typically treat self-intersections as local collision events, but embeddedness (i.e., lack of self-intersections) is a global geometric property that cannot be enforced through local reasoning alone. We introduce an energy-based framework that enforces surface embeddedness simultaneously at the shape and mesh levels, based on the insight that successful untangling requires accounting for both global shape-level interactions and local mesh-level interactions. A shape-level energy captures global entanglement independent of discretization, while a mesh-level penalty regularizes local discrete interactions. Together, these energies enable reliable removal of self-intersections without changing mesh connectivity and apply to a broad class of geometries, including surfaces with boundary, non-manifold configurations, immersion failures, and multi-object scenes. Compared to prior state-of-the-art methods, our approach resolves self-intersections across challenging datasets, enabling reliable downstream processing of surface meshes.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 14,899 篇学术成果中精准定位
Providing haptic feedback in virtual reality (VR) remains challenging, with active haptic systems often being bulky and expensive, while passive haptics typically require pre-fabricated objects or extensive real-world setup. We present ProXeek, an LLM-based multi-agent system that opportunistically leverages real-world objects as haptic proxies for VR experiences. During VR development, the designers could annotate the virtual interactables with emphasized haptic characteristics using our node-based editing interface. On the user side, end users capture environmental snapshots via commodity VR headset, and the system employs LLM-based multimodal reasoning and multi-objective optimization to match virtual objects with viable physical proxies. Our technical evaluation demonstrates that ProXeek effectively identifies viable proxies, confirming the effectiveness of the algorithmic constraint design in our matching pipeline. Our user study further reveals that the ProXeek-selected physical objects could deliver significantly higher haptic fidelity and enhance presence compared to 3D-printed replicas and visual-only interaction.
We propose a unified, few-step generative modeling framework based on cumulative flow maps for long-range transport in probability space, inspired by flow-map techniques for physical transport and dynamics. At its core is a cumulative-flow abstraction that connects local, instantaneous updates with finite-time transport, enabling generative models to reason about global state transitions. This perspective yields a unified few-step framework built on cumulative transport and cumulative parameterization that applies broadly to existing diffusion- and flow-based models without being tied to a specific prediction instantiation. Our formulation supports few-step and even one-step generation while preserving synthesis quality, requiring only minimal changes to time embeddings and training objectives, and no increase in model capacity. We demonstrate its effectiveness across diverse tasks, including image generation, geometric distribution modeling, joint prediction, and SDF generation, with reduced inference cost.
Advances in large language models (LLMs) have sparked interest in automating parametric CAD modeling through natural language. Existing LLM-based approaches often treat CAD modeling as flat text generation, overlooking the hierarchical structure and geometric constraints inherent in CAD programs. We present CAD-Factory, a Text-to-CAD generation system for language-driven CAD modeling that explicitly models the structural and parametric semantics of CAD programs. Our core contribution is a new formulation of CAD generation as structured program synthesis, coupled with a learnable hierarchical CAD program representation that disentangles structural topology from parameter instantiation. Building on this formulation, CAD-Factory adopts a manager–programmer–reviewer architecture: a planning agent infers program hierarchy, a coding agent instantiates symbolic and numerical parameters, and an evaluation module enforces structural validity and geometric feasibility, which supports structure-aware reasoning, constraint-consistent generation, and interpretable program synthesis. An editor–viewer loop further enables part-aware code refinement through visual feedback, supporting iterative and controllable design workflows. We also contribute a process-oriented annotation pipeline and a Text–CAD dataset with parameter-free or partially specified descriptions that reflect real-world design expression. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAD-Factory significantly improves structural correctness and geometric consistency across diverse CAD code generation and editing tasks, establishing a structured, interpretable, and robust framework for AI-assisted design.
Despite rapid advances in multimodal large language models, agricultural applications remain constrained by the lack of multilingual speech data, unified multimodal architectures, and comprehensive evaluation benchmarks. To address these challenges, we present AgriGPT-Omni, an agricultural omni-framework that integrates speech, vision, and text in a unified framework.(1) First, we construct a scalable data synthesis and collection pipeline that converts agricultural texts and images into training data, resulting in the largest agricultural speech dataset to date, including 492K synthetic and 1.4K real speech samples across six languages.(2) Second, based on this, we train the first agricultural Omni-model via a three-stage paradigm: textual knowledge injection, progressive multimodal alignment, and GRPO-based reinforcement learning, enabling unified reasoning across languages and modalities.(3) We further propose AgriBench-Omni-2K, the first tri-modal benchmark for agriculture, covering diverse speech–vision–text tasks and multilingual slices, with standardized protocols and reproducible tools. Experiments show that AgriGPT-Omni significantly outperforms general-purpose baselines on multilingual and multimodal reasoning as well as real-world speech understanding.
As model parameter sizes scale into the billions and training consumes zettaFLOPs of computation, the reuse of Machine Learning (ML) assets and collaborative development have become increasingly prevalent in the ML community. These ML assets, including models, datasets, and software, may originate from various sources and be published under different licenses, which govern the use and distribution of licensed works and their derivatives. However, commonly chosen licenses, such as GPL and Apache, are software-specific and are not clearly defined or bounded in the context of model publishing. Meanwhile, the reused assets may also be under free-content licenses and model licenses, which pose a potential risk of license noncompliance and rights infringement within the model production workflow. In this paper, we address these challenges along two lines: 1) For ML workflow compliance, we propose ModelGo (MG) Analyzer, a tool that incorporates a vocabulary for ML workflow management and encoded license rules, enabling ontological reasoning to analyze rights granting and compliance issues. 2) For standardized model publishing, we introduce ModelGo Licenses, a set of modell-specific licenses that provide flexible options to meet the diverse needs of the ML community. MG Analyzer is built on Turtle language and Notation3 reasoning engine, envisioned as a first step toward Linked Open Data for ML workflow management. We have also encoded our proposed model licenses into rules and demonstrated the effects of GPL and other commonly used licenses in model publishing, along with the flexibility advantages of our licenses, through comparisons and experiments.
SMART: A Social Movement Analysis & Reasoning Tool with Case Studies on #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter
Social movements supporting the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a vital role in improving human lives. If journalists were aware of the relationship between social movements and external events, they could provide more precise, time-sensitive reporting about movement issues and SDGs. Our SMART system achieves this goal by collecting data from multiple sources, extracting emotions on various themes, and then using a transformer-based forecasting engine (DEEP) to predict quantity and intensity of emotions in future posts. This paper demonstrates SMART's Retrospective capabilities required by journalists via case studies analyzing social media discussions of the #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter before and after the 2024 U.S. election. We create a novel 1-year dataset which we will release upon publication. It contains over 2.7M Reddit posts and over 1M news articles. We show that SMART enables early detection of discourse shifts around key political events, providing journalists with actionable insights to inform editorial planning. SMART was developed through multiple interactions with a panel of over 20 journalists from a variety of news organizations over a 2-year period, including an author of this paper.
Access to mental healthcare is increasingly strained by workforce shortages and rising demand, motivating the development of intelligent systems that can support mental healthcare experts. We introduce coTherapist, a unified framework utilizing a small language model to emulate core therapeutic competencies through domain-specific fine-tuning, retrieval augmentation, and agentic reasoning. Evaluation on clinical queries demonstrates that coTherapist generates more relevant and clinically grounded responses than contemporary baselines. Using our novel T-BARS rubric and psychometric profiling, we confirm coTherapist exhibits high empathy and therapist-consistent personality traits. Furthermore, human evaluation by domain experts validates that coTherapist delivers accurate, trustworthy, and safe responses. coTherapist was deployed and tested by clinical experts. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that small models can be engineered to exhibit expert-like behavior, offering a scalable pathway for digital mental health tools.
Misinformation on the web increasingly appears in multimodal forms, combining text, images, and OCR-rendered content in ways that amplify harm to public trust and vulnerable communities. While prior fact-checking systems often rely on unimodal signals or shallow fusion strategies, modern misinformation campaigns operate across modalities and require models that can reason over subtle cross-modal inconsistencies in a transparent and responsible manner. We introduce MultiCheck, a lightweight and interpretable framework for multimodal fact verification that jointly analyzes textual, visual, and OCR evidence. At its core, MultiCheck employs a relational fusion module based on element-wise difference and product operations, allowing for explicit cross-modal interaction modeling with minimal computational overhead. A contrastive alignment objective further helps the model distinguish between supporting and refuting evidence while maintaining a small memory and energy footprint, making it suitable for low-resource deployment. Evaluated on the Factify-2 (5-class) and MOCHEG (3-class) benchmarks, MultiCheck achieves substantial performance improvement and remains robust under noisy OCR and missing modality conditions. Overall, MultiCheck is efficient, interpretable, and robust for multimodal verification. Our code is available at the following: https://github.com/Adityakishore09/MultiCheck_WWW-2026 GitHub repository.
High-fidelity social simulation is pivotal for addressing complex Web societal challenges, yet it demands agents capable of authentically replicating the dynamic spectrum of human interaction. Current LLM-based multi-agent frameworks, however, predominantly adhere to static interaction topologies, failing to capture the fluid oscillation between cooperative knowledge synthesis and competitive critical reasoning seen in real-world scenarios. This rigidity often leads to unrealistic ''groupthink'' or unproductive deadlocks, undermining the credibility of simulations for decision support. To bridge this gap, we propose BEACOF, a belief-driven adaptive collaboration framework inspired by Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium (PBE). By modeling social interaction as a dynamic game of incomplete information, BEACOF rigorously addresses the circular dependency between collaboration type selection and capability estimation. Agents iteratively refine probabilistic beliefs about peer capabilities and autonomously modulate their collaboration strategy, thereby ensuring sequentially rational decisions under uncertainty. Validated across adversarial (judicial), open-ended (social) and mixed (medical) scenarios, BEACOF prevents coordination failures and fosters robust convergence toward high-quality solutions, demonstrating superior potential for reliable social simulation. Source codes and datasets are publicly released at: https://github.com/WUT-IDEA/BEACOF.
Web-based platforms are becoming a primary channel for psychological support, yet most LLM-driven chatbots remain opaque, single-stage, and weakly grounded in established therapeutic practice. To address this gap, we present XInsight, a multi-agent framework that models psychological support as a stage-consistent workflow aligned with the classical Exploration-Insight-Action paradigm. Building on structured client representations, XInsight orchestrates specialized agents under a unified Reason-Intervene-Reflect cycle: an Exploration agent organizes background and concerns into a structured Case Conceptualization Form, a Routing agent performs Adaptive Therapeutic Routing (ATR) across SFBT, CBT, and MBCT, a unified Therapeutic agent executes school-consistent submodules, and a Consolidation agent guides review, skill integration, and relapse-prevention planning. A Recording agent continuously transforms open-ended web dialogues into standardized psychological artifacts, enhancing interpretability, continuity, and accountability. To support transparent assessment, we introduce XInsight-Bench with a Scale-Guided LLM Evaluation (SGLE) protocol that combines therapy-specific clinical scales with general counseling criteria. Experiments show improved paradigm alignment, multi-therapy integration, interaction depth, and interpretability over existing multi-agent counseling systems, indicating that XInsight provides a practical blueprint for integrating counseling-inspired support agents into web applications for digital well-being.
Precision pathology relies on detecting fine-grained morphological abnormalities within specific Regions of Interest (ROIs), as these local, texture-rich cues—rather than global slide contexts—drive expert diagnostic reasoning. While Vision-Language (V-L) models promise data efficiency by leveraging semantic priors, adapting them faces a critical Granularity Mismatch, where generic representations fail to resolve such subtle defects. Current adaptation methods often treat modalities as independent streams, failing to ground semantic prompts in ROI-specific visual contexts. To bridge this gap, we propose the Hierarchical Adaptation and Alignment Framework (HAAF ). At its core is a novel Cross-Level Scaled Alignment (CLSA) mechanism that enforces a sequential calibration order: visual features first inject context into text prompts to generate content-adaptive descriptors, which then spatially guide the visual encoder to spotlight anomalies. Additionally, a dual-branch inference strategy integrates semantic scores with geometric prototypes to ensure stability in few-shot settings. Experiments on four benchmarks show HAAF significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods and effectively scales with domain-specific backbones (e.g., CONCH) in low-resource scenarios.
As web platforms evolve towards greater personalization and emotional complexity, conversational agents must transcend superficial empathy to demonstrate identity-aware emotional reasoning. However, existing systems face two limitations: (1) reliance on situation-centric datasets lacking persistent user identity, which hampers the capture of personalized affective nuances; and (2) dependence on opaque, coarse reward signals that hinder development of verifiable empathetic reasoning. To address these gaps, we introduce KardiaBench, a large-scale user-grounded benchmark comprising 178,080 QA pairs across 22,080 multi-turn conversations anchored to 671 real-world profiles. The dataset is constructed via a model-in-the-loop pipeline with iterative rubric-guided refinement to ensure psychological plausibility and persona consistency. This progressive empathy pipeline that integrates user comprehension, contextual reasoning, and emotion perception into conversations, followed by iterative critique and rubric-based refinement to ensure psychological plausibility, emotional fidelity, and persona consistency. Building on this, we propose Kardia-R1, a framework that trains models for interpretable, stepwise empathetic cognition. Kardia-R1 leverages Rubric-as-Judge Empathetic Reinforcement Learning (Rubric-ERL), a GRPO-based method that uses explainable, human-aligned rubric rewards to tightly couple user understanding, emotional inference, and supportive response generation. Extensive experiments across four LLM backbones demonstrate that Kardia-R1 consistently outperforms other methods in emotion accuracy, empathy, relevance, persona consistency, and safety.
As the Web transitions from static retrieval to generative interaction, the escalating environmental footprint of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a critical sustainability challenge. Current paradigms indiscriminately apply computation-intensive strategies like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to billions of daily queries, causing LLM overthinking, a redundancy that amplifies carbon emissions and operational barriers. This inefficiency directly undermines UN Sustainable Development Goals 13 (Climate Action) and 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by hindering equitable AI access in resource-constrained regions. To address this, we introduce EcoThink, an energy-aware adaptive inference framework designed to reconcile high-performance AI intelligence with environmental responsibility. EcoThink employs a lightweight, distillation-based router to dynamically assess query complexity, skipping unnecessary reasoning for factoid retrieval while reserving deep computation for complex logic. Extensive evaluations across 9 diverse benchmarks demonstrate that EcoThink reduces inference energy by 40.4% on average (up to 81.9% for web knowledge retrieval) without statistically significant performance loss. By mitigating algorithmic waste, EcoThink offers a scalable path toward a sustainable, inclusive, and energy-efficient generative AI Agent.
Major social media platforms increasingly adopt community-based fact-checking to address misinformation on their platforms. While previous research has largely focused on its effect on engagement (e. g., reposts), an understanding of how fact-checks affect a user's follower base is missing. In this study, we employ quasi-experimental methods to causally assess whether users lose followers after their posts are corrected via community fact-checks. Based on time-series data on follower counts for N = 4391 community fact-checked posts from X, we find that community fact-checks do not lead to meaningful declines in the follower counts of users who post misleading content. This suggests that followers of spreaders of misleading posts tend to remain loyal and do not view community fact-checks as a sufficient reason to disengage. Our findings underscore the need for complementary interventions to more effectively disincentivize the production of misinformation on social media.
Deep learning has made remarkable progress in medical image analysis, yet its black-box nature still limits interpretability and clinician trust. Concept-based modeling offers a promising direction for explainable AI by integrating human-understandable concepts. However, existing approaches typically rely on global concept annotations and infer diagnosis based solely on the presence or absence of individual concepts. This oversimplified paradigm ignores the rich relationships among concepts and their causal influence on disease outcomes. To overcome these limitations, we propose the Concept Relationship Embedding Model (CREM) for interpretable medical diagnosis. CREM mirrors coarse-to-fine clinical reasoning by first extracting fine-grained subregional concepts, then explicitly encoding their relationships as a concept interaction graph, and finally performing causal inference between concepts and diagnoses to enable reliable and transparent diagnostic predictions. We evaluate CREM on four public medical imaging benchmarks, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance on both concept recognition and disease classification tasks, while exhibiting improved robustness, label efficiency, and interpretability. Furthermore, we deploy CREM as an interactive web-based demo that allows clinicians to visualize concept activations, trace diagnostic reasoning paths, and iteratively refine concept cues, facilitating effective human-in-the-loop decision-making.