We present a novel three-stage framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) within a risk-aware multi-agent system for automate strategy finding in quantitative finance. Our approach addresses the brittleness of traditional deep learning models in financial applications by: employing prompt-engineered LLMs to generate executable alpha factor candidates across diverse financial data, implementing multimodal agent-based evaluation that filters factors based on market status, predictive quality while maintaining category balance, and deploying dynamic weight optimization that adapts to market conditions. Experimental results demonstrate the robust performance of the strategy in Chinese & US market regimes compared to established benchmarks. Our work extends LLMs capabilities to quantitative trading, providing a scalable architecture for financial signal extraction and portfolio construction. The overall framework significantly outperforms all benchmarks with 53.17% cumulative return on SSE50 (Jan 2023 to Jan 2024), demonstrating superior risk-adjusted performance and downside protection on the market.
论文检索
输入标题、作者或关键词，从 7,591 篇学术成果中精准定位
LLMs are becoming increasingly capable and widespread. Consequently, the potential and reality of their misuse is also growing. In this work, we address the problem of detecting LLM-generated text that is not explicitly declared as such. We present a novel, general-purpose, and supervised LLM text detector, SElected-Next-Token tRAnsformer (SENTRA). SENTRA is a Transformer-based encoder leveraging selected-next-token-probability sequences and utilizing contrastive pre-training on large amounts of unlabeled data. Our experiments on three popular public datasets across 24 domains of text demonstrate SENTRA is a general-purpose classifier that significantly outperforms popular baselines in the out-of-domain setting.
From n-gram to Attention: How Model Architectures Learn and Propagate Bias in Language Modeling
PDF ↗Current research on bias in language models (LMs) predominantly focuses on data quality, with significantly less attention paid to model architecture and temporal influences of data. Even more critically, few studies systematically investigate the origins of bias. We propose a methodology grounded in comparative behavioral theory to interpret the complex interaction between training data and model architecture in bias propagation during language modeling. Building on recent work that relates transformers to n-gram LMs, we evaluate how data, model design choices, and temporal dynamics affect bias propagation. Our findings reveal that: (1) n-gram LMs are highly sensitive to context window size in bias propagation, while transformers demonstrate architectural robustness; (2) the temporal provenance of training data significantly affects bias; and (3) different model architectures respond differentially to controlled bias injection, with certain biases (e.g. sexual orientation) being disproportionately amplified. As language models become ubiquitous, our findings highlight the need for a holistic approach- tracing bias to its origins across both data and model dimensions, not just symptoms, to mitigate harm.
Glitter: A Multi-Sentence, Multi-Reference Benchmark for Gender-Fair German Machine Translation
PDF ↗Machine translation (MT) research addressing gender inclusivity has gained attention for promoting non-exclusionary language representing all genders. However, existing resources are limited in size, most often consisting of single sentences, or single gender-fair formulation types, leaving questions about MT models’ ability to use context and diverse inclusive forms. We introduce Glitter, an English-German benchmark featuring extended passages with professional translations implementing three gender-fair alternatives: neutral rewording, typographical solutions (gender star), and neologistic forms (-ens forms). Our experiments reveal significant limitations in state-of-the-art language models, which default to masculine generics, struggle to interpret explicit gender cues in context, and rarely produce gender-fair translations. Through a systematic prompting analysis designed to elicit fair language, we demonstrate that these limitations stem from models’ fundamental misunderstanding of gender phenomena, as they fail to implement inclusive forms even when explicitly instructed. Glitter establishes a challenging benchmark, advancing research in gender-fair English-German MT. It highlights substantial room for improvement among leading models and can guide the development of future MT models capable of accurately representing gender diversity.
Recent advances in chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning have improved complex video understanding, but existing methods often struggle to adapt to domain-specific skills (e.g., temporal grounding, event detection, spatial relations) over various video content. To address this, we propose Video-Skill-CoT (aka Video-SKoT) a framework that automatically constructs and leverages skill-aware CoT supervisions for domain-adaptive video reasoning. First, we construct skill-based CoT annotations: We extract domain-relevant reasoning skills from training questions, cluster them into a shared skill taxonomy, and create detailed multi-step CoT rationale tailored to each video question pair for training. Second, we introduce a skill-specific expert learning framework. Each expert module specializes in a subset of reasoning skills and is trained with lightweight adapters using the collected CoT supervision. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach on three video understanding benchmarks, where Video-SKoT consistently outperforms strong baselines. We also provide in-depth analyses on comparing different CoT annotation pipelines and learned skills over multiple video domains.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering but frequently produce hallucinated outputs that deviate from the actual visual input or prompt. While prior work links hallucination to biases in data or representation, their causal origins remain unclear. We propose a causal framework to analyze and mitigate hallucination in VLMs. Our key hypothesis is that hallucinations arise from unintended direct influences of the vision or text modality that bypass the intended multi-modal fusion. To examine this, we construct a causal graph of the VLM and use counterfactual analysis to estimate the Natural Direct Effect (NDE) of each modality and their interaction. By systematically identifying and suppressing these direct effects, we encourage outputs that are more faithfully grounded in true cross-modal reasoning. Our approach consists of three steps: (1) designing structural causal graphs to distinguish correct fusion pathways from spurious modality shortcuts, (2) estimating modality-specific and cross-modal NDE using perturbed image representations, hallucinated text embeddings, and degraded visual inputs, and (3) implementing a test-time intervention module to dynamically adjust the model’s dependence on each modality. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly reduces hallucination while preserving task performance, providing a robust and interpretable framework for improving VLM reliability.
Adaptive Platt Scaling with Causal Interpretations for Self-Reflective Language Model Uncertainty Estimates
PDF ↗As large language models (LLMs) are consumed by more users and deployed in increasingly autonomous capacities, their ability to self-monitor and ask for human intervention is of vital importance. Underlying this capability are fundamental skills like self-reflection and expression of uncertainty. In this work, we provide a formal analysis of LLM self-reflection for uncertainty estimation, using domain adaptation theory to model the shift between base predictions and reflective judgments. We use this to motivate a temperature scaling algorithm that calibrates uncertainty using comparisons between base predictions and LLM self-reflections. We evaluate our approach on challenging question-answering tasks requiring reasoning, demonstrating that our methods can improve calibration of uncertainty estimates and also offer improvements in human interpretation. More broadly, this use case shows how domain adaptation presents a promising analytical tool for understanding the underlying statistical properties of LLM self-reflections.
Suicide remains a major global mental health challenge, and early intervention hinges on recognizing signs of suicidal ideation. In private conversations, such ideation is often expressed in subtle or conflicted ways, making detection especially difficult. Existing data sets are mainly based on public help-seeking platforms such as Reddit, which fail to capture the introspective and ambiguous nature of suicidal ideation in more private contexts. To address this gap, we introduce , a novel dataset of 1,200 test cases simulating implicit suicidal ideation within psychologically rich dialogue scenarios. Each case is grounded in psychological theory, combining the Death/Suicide Implicit Association Test (D/S-IAT) patterns, expanded suicidal expressions, cognitive distortions, and contextual stressors. In addition, we propose a psychology-guided evaluation framework to assess the ability of LLMs to identify implicit suicidal ideation through their responses. Experiments with eight widely used LLMs across varied prompting conditions reveal that current models often struggle significantly to recognize implicit suicidal ideation. Our findings highlight the urgent need for more clinically grounded evaluation frameworks and design practices to ensure the safe use of LLMs in sensitive support systems.
Sign Language Translation has advanced with deep learning, yet evaluations remain largely signer-dependent, with overlapping signers across train/dev/test. This raises concerns about whether models truly generalise or instead rely on signer-specific regularities. We conduct signer-fold cross-validation on GFSLT-VLP, GASLT, and SignCL—three leading, publicly available, gloss-free SLT models—on CSL-Daily and PHOENIX14T. Under signer-independent evaluation, performance drops sharply: on PHOENIX14T, GFSLT-VLP falls from BLEU-4 21.44 to 3.59 and ROUGE-L 42.49 to 11.89; GASLT from 15.74 to 8.26; and SignCL from 22.74 to 3.66. We also observe that in CSL-Daily many target sentences are performed by multiple signers, so common splits can place identical sentences in both training and test, inflating absolute scores by rewarding recall of recurring sentences rather than genuine generalisation. These findings indicate that signer-dependent evaluation can substantially overestimate SLT capability. We recommend: (1) adopting signer-independent protocols to ensure generalisation to unseen signers; (2) restructuring datasets to include explicit signer-independent, sentence-disjoint splits for consistent benchmarking; and (3) reporting both signer-dependent and signer-independent results together with train–test sentence overlap to improve transparency and comparability.
In-context learning (ICL) effectively conditions large language models (LLMs) for molecular tasks, such as property prediction and molecule captioning, by embedding carefully selected demonstration examples into the input prompt. This approach eliminates the computational overhead of extensive pre-training and fine-tuning. However, current prompt retrieval methods for molecular tasks rely on molecule feature similarity, such as Morgan fingerprints, which do not adequately capture the global molecular and atom-binding relationships. As a result, these methods fail to represent the full complexity of molecular structures during inference. Moreover, medium-sized LLMs, which offer simpler deployment requirements in specialized systems, have remained largely unexplored in the molecular ICL literature. To address these gaps, we propose a self-supervised learning technique, GAMIC (Graph-Aligned Molecular In-Context learning), which aligns global molecular structures, represented by graph neural networks (GNNs), with textual captions (descriptions) while leveraging local feature similarity through Morgan fingerprints. In addition, we introduce a Maximum Marginal Relevance (MMR) based diversity heuristic during retrieval to optimize input prompt demonstration samples. Our experimental findings using diverse benchmark datasets show GAMIC outperforms simple Morgan-based ICL retrieval methods across all tasks by up to 45%. Our code is available at: https://github.com/aliwister/mol-icl.
Recent work has investigated the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) as zero-shot models for generating individual-level characteristics (e.g., to serve as risk models or augment survey datasets). However, when should a user have confidence that an LLM will provide high-quality predictions for their particular task? To address this question, we conduct a large-scale empirical study of LLMs’ zero-shot predictive capabilities across a wide range of tabular prediction tasks. We find that LLMs’ performance is highly variable, both on tasks within the same dataset and across different datasets. However, when the LLM performs well on the base prediction task, its predicted probabilities become a stronger signal for individual-level accuracy. Then, we construct metrics to predict LLMs’ performance at the task level, aiming to distinguish between tasks where LLMs may perform well and where they are likely unsuitable. We find that some of these metrics, each of which are assessed without labeled data, yield strong signals of LLMs’ predictive performance on new tasks.
Digital tool-based agents, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), that invoke external Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) often rely on documentation to understand API functionality. However, such documentation is frequently missing, outdated, privatized, or inconsistent—hindering the development of reliable, general-purpose agents. In this work, we propose a new research direction: learning of API functionality directly from in-context demonstrations. This task is a new paradigm applicable in scenarios without documentation. Using API benchmarks, we collect demonstrations from both expert agents and from self-exploration. To understand what information demonstrations must convey for successful task completion, we extensively study how the number of demonstrations and the use of LLM-generated summaries and evaluations affect the task success rate of the API-based agent. Our experiments across 3 datasets and 6 models show that learning functionality from in-context demonstrations remains a non-trivial challenge, even for state-of-the-art LLMs. We find that providing explicit function calls and natural language critiques significantly improves the agent’s task success rate due to more accurate parameter filling. We analyze failure modes, identify sources of error, and highlight key open challenges for future work in documentation-free, self-improving, API-based agents.
The increasing size and complexity of large language models (LLMs) raise concerns about their ability to “cheat” on standard Question Answering (QA) benchmarks by memorizing task-specific data. This undermines the validity of benchmark evaluations, as they no longer reflect genuine model capabilities but instead the effects of data leakage. While existing methods detect such leakage, they fail to address the long-term challenge of mitigating it. In this paper, we introduce LastingBench, a novel approach to reinforce and safeguard existing benchmarks against knowledge leakage. Our method involves identifying leakage points through perturbation-based detection, followed by counterfactual rewriting to disrupt memorization while preserving the benchmark’s original evaluative intent. We demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces memorization effects in long-context QA benchmarks, providing a more accurate assessment of model reasoning and generalization abilities. Our experiments show that LastingBench not only uncovers substantial leakage in benchmarks like HotpotQA but also yields a more reliable evaluation of state-of-the-art models, ensuring that benchmarks remain effective and resilient over time.
CMT-Eval: A Novel Chinese Multi-turn Dialogue Evaluation Dataset Addressing Real-world Conversational Challenges
PDF ↗Multi-turn dialogue is a key paradigm for interaction between users and Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation benchmarks fail to capture users’ evolving needs and how their diverse conversation styles affect the dialogue flow. To address these limitations, we propose CMT-Eval, the first dedicated dataset for fine-grained evaluation of Chinese multi-turn dialogue systems. Built upon a linguistic theory-driven Speech Act Framework, diverse user personas, and varied conversational challenges, CMT-Eval comprises 596 high-quality dialogues with 4,431 turns, simulating realistic, multifaceted, and challenging conversations. Experiments reveal that models struggle with specific speech acts, user personas, and complex scenarios, highlighting the effectiveness of CMT-Eval in assessing LLMs’ multi-turn dialogue capabilities and providing valuable insights for their enhancement. The dataset, code, and prompts are available at https://github.com/hejaida/CMT-Eval.
In the past year, large (>100B parameter) mixture-of-expert (MoE) models have become increasingly common in the open domain. While their advantages are often framed in terms of efficiency, prior work has also explored functional differentiation through routing behavior. We investigate whether expert routing in large MoE models is influenced by the semantics of the inputs. To test this, we design two controlled experiments. First, we compare activations on sentence pairs with a shared target word used in the same or different senses. Second, we fix context and substitute the target word with semantically similar or dissimilar alternatives. Comparing expert overlap across these conditions reveals clear, statistically significant evidence of semantic routing in large MoE models.
The combination of pre-trained speech encoders with large language models has enabled the development of speech LLMs that can handle a wide range of spoken language processing tasks. While these models are powerful and flexible, this very flexibility may make them more vulnerable to adversarial attacks. To examine the extent of this problem, in this work we investigate universal acoustic adversarial attacks on speech LLMs. Here a fixed, universal, adversarial audio segment is prepended to the original input audio. We initially investigate attacks that cause the model to either produce no output or to perform a modified task overriding the original prompt. We then extend the nature of the attack to be selective so that it activates only when specific input attributes, such as a speaker gender or spoken language, are present. Inputs without the targeted attribute should be unaffected, allowing fine-grained control over the model outputs. Our findings reveal critical vulnerabilities in Qwen2-Audio and Granite-Speech and suggest that similar speech LLMs may be susceptible to universal adversarial attacks. This highlights the need for more robust training strategies and improved resistance to adversarial attacks.
Defense strategies of large language models besides alignment are introduced to defend against jailbreak attacks, and they have managed to decrease the success rate of jailbreak attacks. However, these defense strategies weakened the helpfulness of large language models. In this work, we propose a universal framework, LlmFixer, acting on large language models equipped with any defense strategy to recover their original helpfulness. LlmFixer consists of an input prompt re-writer and a logic patch. The prompt re-writer is a pre-model for clarifying the intention of input prompts, which promotes large language models to be more helpful to benign inputs and more rejective to malicious inputs. The logic patch is a lightweight structure that enhances large language models’ comprehension capacity by supplementing certain logical relationships. Without updating the parameters of a defensive large language model, LlmFixer fixes its helpfulness while preserving safety. Experiments on three large language models, five jailbreak attacks, and four defense strategies show the effectiveness of LlmFixer.
Lemmatization is the task of transforming all words in a given text to their dictionary forms. While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to achieve competitive results across a wide range of NLP tasks, there is no prior evidence of how effective they are in the contextual lemmatization task. In this paper, we empirically investigate the capacity of the latest generation of LLMs to perform in-context lemmatization, comparing it to the traditional fully supervised approach. In particular, we consider the setting in which supervised training data is not available for a target domain or language, comparing (i) encoder-only supervised approaches, fine-tuned out-of-domain, and (ii) cross-lingual methods, against direct in-context lemma generation with LLMs. Our experimental investigation across 12 languages of different morphological complexity finds that, while encoders remain competitive in out-of-domain settings when fine-tuned on gold data, current LLMs reach state-of-the-art results for most languages by directly generating lemmas in-context without prior fine-tuning, provided just with a few examples. Data and code will be made available upon publication.
Humans have an inherent need for community belongingness. This paper investigates this fundamental social motivation by compiling a large collection of parallel datasets comprising over 7 million posts and comments from Reddit and 200,000 posts and comments from Dread, a dark web discussion forum, covering similar topics. Grounded in five theoretical aspects of the Sense of Community framework, our analysis indicates that users on Dread exhibit a stronger sense of community membership. Our data analysis reveals striking similarities in post content across both platforms, despite the dark web’s restricted accessibility. However, these communities differ significantly in community-level closeness, including member interactions and greeting patterns that influence user retention and dynamics. We publicly release the parallel community datasets for other researchers to examine key differences and explore potential directions for further study.
Skeleton-Guided-Translation: A Benchmarking Framework for Code Repository Translation with Fine-Grained Quality Evaluation
PDF ↗Code translation benchmarks are essential for evaluating the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-based systems. Existing benchmarks mainly target individual functions, overlooking repository-level challenges like intermodule coherence and dependency management. Recent repository-level efforts exist, but suffer from poor maintainability and coarse evaluation granularity. We introduce Skeleton-Guided-Translation, a framework for benchmarking Java-to-C# translation at the repository level, featuring fine-grained quality evaluation. It follows a two-step process: first translating repository “skeletons”, then refining the entire repository guided by these skeletons. Based on this, we present TRANSREPO-BENCH , the first test-driven benchmark of high-quality Java repositories paired with C# skeletons, unit tests, and build configurations. Our adaptive unit tests support multiple and incremental translations without manual tuning, enhancing automation and scalability. We also propose fine-grained metrics that evaluate translation quality per test case, overcoming limitations of binary metrics in distinguishing build failures. Evaluations using TRANSREPO-BENCH reveal issues like broken cross-file references, showing that our structured approach reduces dependency errors and preserves interface consistency.