论文检索

输入标题、作者或关键词,从 1,056 篇学术成果中精准定位

会议来源 全部会议

机器学习与综合 AI

自然语言处理

计算机视觉

数据挖掘与 Web

多媒体与图形学

未选择时检索全部会议
支持跨会议组合检索,PDF 均跳转至官方来源
1,056篇论文匹配“Social Sciences”
第 6 / 53 页

Social Aspects · Safety

Xiaoyu Xu, Xiang Yue, Yang Liu, Qingqing Ye, Huadi Zheng, Peizhao Hu, Minxin Du, Haibo Hu

Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) aims to remove specified data, but its efficacy is typically assessed with task-level metrics like accuracy and perplexity. We demonstrate that these metrics are often misleading, as models can appear to forget while their original behavior is easily restored through minimal fine-tuning. This phenomenon of \emph{reversibility} suggests that information is merely suppressed, not genuinely erased. To address this critical evaluation gap, we introduce a \emph{representation-level analysis framework}. Our toolkit comprises PCA similarity and shift, centered kernel alignment (CKA), and Fisher information, complemented by a summary metric, the mean PCA distance, to measure representational drift. Applying this framework across six unlearning methods, three data domains, and multiple LLMs, we identify four distinct forgetting regimes based on their \emph{reversibility} and \emph{catastrophicity}. We compare recovery strategies and show that relearning efficiency relies on the data source. We also find that irreversible, non-catastrophic forgetting is exceptionally challenging. By probing unlearning limits, we identify a case of seemingly irreversible, targeted forgetting, offering insights for more robust erasure algorithms. Overall, our findings expose a gap in current evaluation and establish a representation-level foundation for trustworthy unlearning.

Social Aspects · Privacy

Zheng Liu, Chen GONG, Terry Yue Zhuo, Zhou Yang, Kecen Li, Wenlong Meng, Xinwen Hou, Yu Liu, Xiaochen Li

Large language models fine-tuned on instruction–code pairs may memorize and subsequently leak sensitive training data. Existing differentially private (DP) code generation methods primarily protect code snippets while assuming prompts are public, which fails in realistic scenarios where prompts may also contain sensitive information. When prompts cannot be explicitly learned or used during generation, code synthesis suffers from severe utility degradation and reduced diversity. To address these challenges, we propose PrivCode++, the first work to explore DP code generation under where both prompts and code snippets are considered sensitive in LLM fine-tuning. PrivCode++ introduces a two-stage DP framework with a Privacy-Free Latent Conditioning module, enabling effective DP fine-tuning and data synthesis without direct access to sensitive prompts or code. Extensive experiments show that PrivCode++ achieves substantially higher utility than baselines, remains competitive with the method with relaxing privacy assumptions, and provides stronger privacy guarantees.

Social Aspects · Safety

Jialin Wu, Wei Shi, Han Shen, Peigui Qi, Kunsheng Tang, Zhicong Huang, Binghao Wang, Zhou Yang

Despite the advanced capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), they frequently suffer from object hallucination. One reason is that visual features and pretrained textual representations often become intertwined in the deeper network layers. To address this, we propose REVIS, a training-free framework designed to explicitly re-activate this suppressed visual information. Rooted in latent space geometry, REVIS extracts the pure visual information vector via orthogonal projection and employs a calibrated strategy to perform sparse intervention only at the precise depth where suppression occurs. This surgical approach effectively restores visual information with minimal computational cost. Empirical evaluations on standard benchmarks demonstrate that REVIS reduces object hallucination rates by approximately 19% compared to state-of-the-art baselines, while preserving general reasoning capabilities.

Deep Learning · Other Representation Learning

Kenny Peng, Rajiv Movva, Jon Kleinberg, Emma Pierson, Nikhil Garg

While sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have generated significant excitement, a series of negative results have added to skepticism about their usefulness. Here, we establish a conceptual distinction that reconciles competing narratives surrounding SAEs. We argue that even if SAEs may be less effective for *acting on known concepts*, SAEs are especially powerful tools for *discovering unknown concepts*. This distinction separates existing negative results from positive results, and suggests several classes of SAE applications. Specifically, we outline use cases for SAEs in (i) ML interpretability, explainability, fairness, auditing, and safety, and (ii) social and health sciences.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Hengyu Liu, TIANYI LI, Zhihong Cui, Yushuai Li, Zhangkai Wu, Torben Pedersen, Kristian Torp, Christian S Jensen

This position paper argues that reliable AI requires infrastructure for human validation of implicit knowledge. AI learns from both explicit knowledge (papers, documentation, structured databases) and implicit knowledge (reasoning patterns, debugging processes, intermediate steps). Implicit knowledge remains unexternalized because documentation cost exceeds perceived value—yet AI learns from it indiscriminately, acquiring both beneficial patterns and harmful biases. Current reliability methods can only verify explicit knowledge against sources, creating a fundamental gap: the most valuable AI capabilities (reasoning, judgment, intuition) are precisely those we cannot verify. We propose Knowledge Objects (KOs)—structured artifacts that externalize implicit knowledge into forms humans can inspect, verify, and endorse. KOs transform verification economics: what was previously too costly to verify becomes feasible, enabling accumulated human validation to improve reliability over time.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Giovanni De Felice, Riccardo D`Elia, Alberto Termine, Pietro Barbiero, Giuseppe Marra, Silvia Santini

Deep time series models continue to improve predictive performance, yet their deployment remains limited by their black-box nature. In response, existing interpretability approaches in the field keep focusing on explaining the internal model computations, without addressing whether they align or not with how a human would reason about the studied phenomenon. Instead, we state interpretability in deep time series models should pursue semantic alignment: predictions should be expressed in terms of variables that are meaningful to the end user, mediated by spatial and temporal mechanisms that admit user-dependent constraints. In this paper, we formalize this requirement and require that, once established, semantic alignment must be preserved under temporal evolution: a constraint with no analog in static settings. Provided with this definition, we outline a blueprint for semantically aligned deep time series models, identify properties that support trust, and discuss implications for model design.

Social Aspects · Accountability, Transparency, and Interpretability

Yazheng Liu, Xi Zhang, Sihong Xie, Hui Xiong

Temporal graphs are ubiquitous in real-world applications such as social networks and finance, where Temporal Graph Networks (TGNs) capture both structural and temporal dependencies, achieving in superior predictive accuracy. Understanding which historical events drive specific model predictions can enhance trustworthiness of TGNs. Existing explanation methods overlook the memory module, the core component that records and updates node histories, leaving the influence of past events unexplored. To address this challenge, we propose a method that attributes TGNs predictions through the topology attribution tree and memory backtracking tree. The topology attribution tree captures the influence of neighbors and their memory vectors, then the memory backtracking tree quantifies how historical events shape node memory vectors. We apply the LRP in TGNs, ensuring that the total contribution of events equals the model’s logits. Finally, top-k selection may lack faithfulness due to the nonliear relationship between logits and probabilities. We design optimization objectives to map logits to probabilities and identify the important events. Experiments on nine temporal graph datasets, spanning node property prediction, link prediction tasks and graph classification tasks, show that our method provides faithful explanations and outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Social Aspects · Fairness

Samuel Gruffaz, Gabriel Singer, Olivier VO VAN, Nicolas Vayatis, Argyris Kalogeratos

In many machine learning applications acquiring reliable ground-truth labels is costly, or unfeasible, leading practitioners to rely on crowdsourcing and aggregation of noisy human annotations. When labels are subjective, however, aggregation may amplify individual biases, particularly with respect to sensitive attributes, raising fairness concerns. Despite this, fairness in crowdsourced aggregation remains largely unexplored, with no existing convergence guarantees and only limited post-processing approaches for enforcing $\varepsilon$-fairness under demographic parity. We address this gap by analyzing fairness properties of crowdsourcing aggregation methods within the $\varepsilon$-fairness framework, focusing on Majority Voting and Optimal Bayesian aggregation. In the small-crowd regime, we derive an upper bound on the fairness gap of Majority Voting in terms of the individual annotators’ fairness gaps. We further show that the fairness gap of the aggregated consensus converges exponentially fast to that of the ground truth under interpretable conditions. Since the ground truth itself may still be unfair, we generalize a state-of-the-art multiclass fairness post-processing algorithm from the continuous to the discrete setting, enabling the enforcement of strict demographic parity constraints for any aggregation rule. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and corroborate the theoretical insights.

Social Aspects · Privacy

Hilal Asi, Hongjie Chen

We study the problem of private hypothesis selection: given samples from an unknown distribution drawn from a finite hypothesis class, the goal is to identify the best hypothesis under the constraint of differential privacy. Existing algorithms for this problem are either computationally expensive or achieve sub-optimal statistical rates. We propose new algorithms that achieve near-optimal rates while running in nearly linear time in the number of hypotheses. Rather than applying the exponential mechanism directly with a score function that requires pairwise comparisons between hypotheses, our approach introduces a carefully designed loss function based on a small set of strong hypotheses. This structure allows the score to be evaluated efficiently for most hypotheses, yielding significant computational savings. We further extend our algorithms to the agnostic setting, where the true distribution may not belong to the hypothesis class. As an application, we obtain faster differentially private algorithms for universal statistical estimation in low dimensional settings.

Applications · Social Sciences

Haofei Yu, Yining Zhao, Guanyu Lin, Jiaxuan You

Understanding and predicting how social beliefs evolve in response to events—from policy changes to scientific breakthroughs—remains a fundamental challenge in social science. Given LLMs’ commonsense knowledge and social intelligence, we ask: *Can LLMs model the dynamics of social beliefs following social events?* In this work, we introduce the concept of the Social World Model (SWM), a general framework designed to capture how social beliefs evolve in response to major events. SWM learns state-transition functions for social beliefs by mining temporal patterns in social data and optimizing evidence lower bound, without the need for explicit human annotations that link events to belief shifts or expensive census data. To evaluate SWM, we introduce a benchmark, SWM-Bench, derived from real-world prediction market data from both Kalshi and Polymarket. SWM-Bench includes over 10k datapoints for social belief prediction tasks spanning diverse domains such as politics, sports, cryptocurrency, and elections. Our experimental results show that SWM significantly outperforms time-series foundation models, achieving RMSE reductions of 8.4% and 11.2% on Polymarket and Kalshi respectively, while offering interpretable insights into the underlying mechanisms of social belief dynamics.

Social Aspects · Security

Ruixuan Huang, Qingyue Wang, Hantao Huang, Yudong Gao, Dong CHEN, Shuai Wang, Wei Wang

Mixture-of-Experts architectures have become the standard for efficient LLM scaling, typically employing expert parallelism to distribute experts across devices. However, the absence of explicit load balancing constraints during inference allows adversarial inputs to trigger severe routing concentration. We demonstrate that out-of-distribution prompts can manipulate the routing mechanism such that all tokens are routed to the same set of top-k experts, which creates computational bottlenecks on certain devices while forcing others to idle. This converts an efficiency mechanism into a denial-of-service attack vector, leading to violations of service-level agreements for time-to-first-token (TTFT). We propose RepetitionCurse, a black-box strategy to exploit this vulnerability. By identifying a universal flaw in MoE router behavior, RepetitionCurse constructs attack prompts using simple repetitive token patterns in a model-agnostic manner. On widely deployed MoE models hosted on 8-GPU clusters, our method increases TTFT by 20% to 148%, significantly degrading service quality.

Social Aspects · Robustness

Tong Liu, Sen Liang, Shuo Bai

Domain generalization (DG) aims to learn representations that remain predictive under distribution shifts. A key challenge is that the target domain is unobserved during training, which complicates the search for invariant representations: alignment objectives that do not account for the preservation of discriminative structure may become ill-conditioned or lead to degenerate solutions, especially under finite samples. We propose Geometric **R**ate–**D**istortion **I**nvariance (**RDI**), a DG framework that addresses this challenge by generalizing classical rate–distortion theory to Grassmann manifolds. **RDI** explicitly models class-conditional representations as low-dimensional subspaces and formulates DG as a joint optimization of (i) cross-domain subspace alignment (geometric distortion) and (ii) spectral–volumetric complexity (a capacity-regularized rate term). This integrated approach is designed to promote stable alignment while preventing the collapse of discriminative geometry, adapting to dataset-specific regimes. We provide finite-sample stability guarantees under bounded shifts. Experiments on DomainBed demonstrate that **RDI** is competitive with strong DG baselines, and ablations verify that reliable generalization necessitates the concerted action of both alignment and complexity control.

Social Aspects · Security

Jianming Chen, Yawen Wang, Junjie Wang, Zhe Liu, Qing Wang, Xu

Tool-calling text-to-image (T2I) agents can plan and execute multi-step tool chains to accomplish complex generation and editing queries. However, this capability introduces a new safety attack surface: harmful outputs may arise from tool orchestration, where individually benign steps combine into unsafe results, making prompt-only jailbreak techniques insufficient. We present OrchJail, an orchestration-guided fuzzing framework for jailbreaking tool-calling T2I agents. Its core idea is to exploit high‑risk tool‑orchestration patterns: by learning from successful jailbreak tool-calling traces and their causal relationships to prompt wording, OrchJail directly guides the fuzzing search toward prompts that are more likely to trigger unsafe multi‑step tool behaviors, rather than relying on surface‑level textual perturbations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OrchJail improves jailbreak effectiveness and efficiency across representative tool-calling T2I agents, achieving higher attack success rates, better image fidelity, and lower query costs, while remaining robust against common jailbreak defenses. Our work highlights tool orchestration as a critical, previously unexplored attack surface and provides a novel framework for uncovering safety risks in T2I agents.

Applications · Social Sciences

Caroline L Wang, Daniel Kasenberg, Kimberly Stachenfeld, Pablo Samuel Castro

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in social and strategic scenarios, it becomes critical to understand where and why their behavior diverges from that of humans. While behavioral game theory (BGT) provides a framework for analyzing behavior, existing models do not fully capture the idiosyncratic behavior of humans or black-box, non-human agents like LLMs. We employ AlphaEvolve, a cutting-edge program discovery tool, to directly discover *interpretable* models of human and LLM behavior from data, thereby enabling open-ended discovery of structural factors driving human and LLM behavior. Our analysis on iterated rock-paper-scissors reveals that frontier LLMs can be capable of deeper strategic behavior than humans. These results provide a foundation for understanding structural differences driving differences in human and LLM behavior in strategic interactions.

Enkelejda Kasneci, Gjergji Kasneci

This position paper argues that effective tutoring requires **corrective friction**: surfacing misconceptions and challenging them supportively to drive conceptual change. Yet preference-aligned LLMs can trade **epistemic rigor** for agreeableness. We identify a **Reasoning-Sycophancy Paradox**: models that resist **context-switch** frame attacks can still capitulate under social-epistemic pressure, especially **authority** ("my notes say I’m right") and **social-affective face-saving** ("please don’t tell me I’m wrong''). We introduce **EduFrameTrap**, a tutoring benchmark across math, physics, economics, chemistry, biology, and computer science that varies student confidence and pressure (context-switch, authority, social-affective). Across two frontier LLMs, context-switch failures are comparatively lower for GPT-5.2, while authority and social pressure more often trigger epistemic retreat. In contrast, Claude shows substantial context-switch fragility in this run. Because these failures are hard to judge automatically, we report two-judge disagreement as a reliability signal. We argue benchmarks should measure *social-epistemic courage*, i.e., supportive but corrective tutoring, and treat *kind-but-correct* behavior as a safety requirement.

Applications · Social Sciences

Hong Qian, Yuanhao Liu, Zihan Zhou, Zongbao Zhang, Hanjie Ge, Haotian Shi, Liang Dou, Xiangfeng Wang, Jing-Wen Yang, Aimin Zhou

While LLM-based agents excel at individual tasks, effective collaboration with realistic human partners remains challenging. Most of the existing conversation-level collaborative studies lack grounded interaction and behavioral execution, motivating the need for cooperative game environments that enable contextualized and immersive collaboration. To this end, this paper proposes CollabBench, a benchmark for evaluating and training collaborative agents in cooperative games. CollabBench features a Diverse Player Profile Simulation pipeline to model varied players behaviors, and a Collaborative Agentic Training paradigm that unifies reasoning, communication, and action via agentic rollouts, optimized with a hybrid reward balancing task efficiency and affective adaptation. We further extend classic environments to CWAH-MultiPlayer and Cook-MultiPlayer for systematic evaluation under diverse personalities. Experiments with efficiency and affective metrics show that our trained models outperform base models, achieving 19.5\% higher efficiency and 24.4\% improved affective performance. Further analysis reveals key collaborative limitations of existing models and offers insights for future collaborative training.

Applications · Social Sciences

Yong Suk Lee

Artificial intelligence is increasingly reshaping how work is performed, organized, and valued. Predicting AI’s impact on labor is a broader scientific question that examines how evolving AI capabilities interact with adoption, organizational change, and political and economic adjustments to reshape tasks, workflows, employment, productivity, wages, and inequality. We argue that predicting AI’s impact on labor should be treated as a core machine learning problem—one that the AI and ML community has a distinctive role in shaping—rather than solely a societal or ethical question. This prediction task sits at the center of modern ML: prediction under non-stationarity, distribution shift, endogenous feedback, and high-stakes uncertainty. We discuss key prediction targets across units of analysis and time horizons, review current approaches in economics, management, and ML, identify technical obstacles that limit existing methods, and propose a research agenda for ML-driven labor prediction.

Social Aspects · Security

Zhiyi Mou, Jingyuan Yang, ZEHENG QIAN, Wangze Ni, Tianfang Xiao, Ning Liu, Chen Zhang, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks, they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, which pose significant risks to their secure deployment. Current safetymechanisms primarily rely on output guardrails to filter harmful outputs, yet these defenses are not impenetrable. Due to LLMs' inherent reliance on autoregressive, token-by-token inference, their semantic representations lack robustness to spatially structured perturbations, such as redistributing tokens across different rows, columns, or diagonals. Exploiting the Transformer's spatial weakness, we propose SpatialJB to disrupt the model's output generation process, allowing harmful content to bypass guardrails without detection. Comprehensive experiments conducted on leading LLMs get nearly 100% ASR, demonstrating the high effectiveness of SpatialJB. Even after adding advanced output guardrails, like the OpenAI Moderation API, SpatialJB consistently maintains a success rate exceeding 75%, outperforming current jailbreak techniques by a significant margin. The proposal of SpatialJB exposes a key weak- ness in current guardrails and emphasizes the importance of spatial semantics, offering new insights to advance LLM safety research. To prevent potential misuse, we also present baseline defense strategies against SpatialJB and evaluate their effectiveness inmitigating such attacks.

Social Aspects · Security

Ziyuan Fang, Tianyi Wei, Guanjie Wang, Weiming Zhang, Nenghai Yu, Wenbo Zhou

Recent advances in video generation have enabled highly realistic synthetic content, raising concerns about the integrity of digital media and motivating the development of benchmarks and detection methods for generated videos. Prior works have largely prioritized bolstering model generalization against unseen generators. However, we uncover a neglected factor: the quality distribution of real videos plays a pivotal role. Current training protocols suffer from a clear quality bias between real and fake data, prone to shortcut learning. Compounded by testing on similar real data distributions, this creates an illusion of generalization. In reality, these models fail to generalize when exposed to real data with significantly different quality profiles. To address this, we propose training with quality-matched real and fake data to mitigate bias. Building on this, we introduce a data expansion strategy that broadens the training set to comprehensively cover the full quality spectrum. This approach enables the model to learn quality-agnostic features for detection, thereby achieving generalization across real data of varying qualities and enhancing real-world applicability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method scales well across diverse backbones, consistently enhancing the generalization capability of existing models.

Social Aspects · Security

Chengran Yang, zichao wei, Heminghao Deng, Jinfeng Jiang, Zhensu Sun, Ting Zhang, Tianyi Wu, Ming Wen, David Lo

Large Language Model (LLM) based code generation is predominantly formulated as a strictly monotonic process, appending tokens linearly to an immutable prefix. This formulation contrasts to the cognitive process of programming, which is inherently interleaved with forward generation and on-the-fly revision. While prior works attempt to introduce revision via post-hoc agents or external static tools, they either suffer from high latency or fail to leverage the model's intrinsic semantic reasoning. In this paper, we propose Stream of Revision, a paradigm shift that elevates code generation from a monotonic stream to a dynamic, self-correcting trajectory by leveraging model's intrinsic capabilities. We introduce specific action tokens that enable the model to seamlessly backtrack and edit its own history within a single forward pass. By internalizing the revision loop, our framework Stream of Revision allows the model to activate its latent capabilities just-in-time without external dependencies. Empirical results on secure code generation show that Stream of Revision significantly reduces vulnerabilities with minimal inference overhead. We release our code and dataset at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Stream-of-Revision-CB74/}, and models will be released upon publication.